CHAPTER 57

N. Pang
{"title":"CHAPTER 57","authors":"N. Pang","doi":"10.1093/oseo/instance.00076486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years impacts of information and communication technologies, market enclosures, and the opposing struggle to retain community and public goods have had significant impacts on the social interactions of communities. This chapter examines communities in the context of the knowledge commons – a space by which “a particular type of freedom” (Benkler, 2004) can be practised. It also provides an appropriate lexicon to the examination and discourse of communities and the ways they work. As Castells (2003) notes, self-knowledge “is always a construction no matter how much it feels like a discovery” –this construction is enabled when people work or associate themselves with each other. In particular, the chapter is concerned about the structure of open content licenses operating within such domains. The chapter first explores the concept of the knowledge commons to understand the types of intellectual property that are distinctive to communities (public, communal, and private). Thereafter, licenses as a structure are examined as they may apply within such contexts. A significant influence on the discussion is the contemporary media environment that communities operate in today, resulting in the breaking down of boundaries, the blurring of distinctions between an original and a copy, and shifting the nature of production in communities. These debates lead to a case for open content licenses as an appropriate structural mechanism for communities. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2136-7.ch057","PeriodicalId":334049,"journal":{"name":"Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra's Commentary on the Second Book of Psalms","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra's Commentary on the Second Book of Psalms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00076486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years impacts of information and communication technologies, market enclosures, and the opposing struggle to retain community and public goods have had significant impacts on the social interactions of communities. This chapter examines communities in the context of the knowledge commons – a space by which “a particular type of freedom” (Benkler, 2004) can be practised. It also provides an appropriate lexicon to the examination and discourse of communities and the ways they work. As Castells (2003) notes, self-knowledge “is always a construction no matter how much it feels like a discovery” –this construction is enabled when people work or associate themselves with each other. In particular, the chapter is concerned about the structure of open content licenses operating within such domains. The chapter first explores the concept of the knowledge commons to understand the types of intellectual property that are distinctive to communities (public, communal, and private). Thereafter, licenses as a structure are examined as they may apply within such contexts. A significant influence on the discussion is the contemporary media environment that communities operate in today, resulting in the breaking down of boundaries, the blurring of distinctions between an original and a copy, and shifting the nature of production in communities. These debates lead to a case for open content licenses as an appropriate structural mechanism for communities. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2136-7.ch057
57章
近年来,信息和通信技术的影响、市场的封闭以及保持社区和公共产品的对立斗争对社区的社会互动产生了重大影响。本章考察了知识公地背景下的社区——一个“特定类型的自由”(Benkler, 2004)得以实践的空间。它还为社区及其工作方式的检查和论述提供了适当的词汇。正如卡斯特(2003)所指出的那样,自我认识“总是一种建构,无论它感觉多么像一种发现”——这种建构是在人们相互工作或相互联系时实现的。本章特别关注在这些领域内运行的开放内容许可的结构。本章首先探讨了知识公地的概念,以了解社区特有的知识产权类型(公共、公共和私人)。此后,将对许可作为一种结构进行检查,因为它们可能适用于此类上下文中。对讨论产生重大影响的是社区今天所处的当代媒体环境,它打破了边界,模糊了原创和复制之间的区别,并改变了社区生产的性质。这些争论导致了开放内容许可作为社区的适当结构机制的案例。DOI: 10.4018 / 978 - 1 - 4666 - 2136 - 7. - ch057
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信