Some issues of labor regulation of medical and pharmaceutical workers in selected OECD countries

M.K. Khassenov
{"title":"Some issues of labor regulation of medical and pharmaceutical workers in selected OECD countries","authors":"M.K. Khassenov","doi":"10.32523/2616-6844-2021-137-4-98-109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of a study of the legal basis for the labor activity of medical and pharmaceutical workers in some states that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (hereinafter - OECD). The author provides general features and specifics of labor regulation models in the healthcare sector. The article analyzes legislation and law enforcement. Thus, the European (continental) and Anglo-American models stand out, which differ in the direction of regulation. The first model is distinguished by the social orientation of labor regulation and public law regulation of disciplinary liability issues through quasi-state bodies of control and supervision. Whereas the second model provides for more autonomy to the parties to labor relations in establishing working conditions and private law regulation of disciplinary liability issues through self-regulatory professional organizations. The second model is more flexible, allowing more freedom to build labor relations with medical and pharmaceutical personnel, contributing to the development of the market for medical services and the efficiency of the health care system. The article substantiates the need for the reception of individual institutions and norms of labor and medical law of the states in question in the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In particular, there is a need for an independent law regulating the legal status of medical and pharmaceutical workers by analogy with foreign laws on the regulation of medical professions, in order to differentiate the norms that establish the specifics of the application of disciplinary measures, compliance with professional ethics and quality standards.","PeriodicalId":300299,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6844-2021-137-4-98-109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study of the legal basis for the labor activity of medical and pharmaceutical workers in some states that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (hereinafter - OECD). The author provides general features and specifics of labor regulation models in the healthcare sector. The article analyzes legislation and law enforcement. Thus, the European (continental) and Anglo-American models stand out, which differ in the direction of regulation. The first model is distinguished by the social orientation of labor regulation and public law regulation of disciplinary liability issues through quasi-state bodies of control and supervision. Whereas the second model provides for more autonomy to the parties to labor relations in establishing working conditions and private law regulation of disciplinary liability issues through self-regulatory professional organizations. The second model is more flexible, allowing more freedom to build labor relations with medical and pharmaceutical personnel, contributing to the development of the market for medical services and the efficiency of the health care system. The article substantiates the need for the reception of individual institutions and norms of labor and medical law of the states in question in the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In particular, there is a need for an independent law regulating the legal status of medical and pharmaceutical workers by analogy with foreign laws on the regulation of medical professions, in order to differentiate the norms that establish the specifics of the application of disciplinary measures, compliance with professional ethics and quality standards.
选定经合组织国家中医疗和制药工人劳动法规的一些问题
本文介绍了对经济合作与发展组织(以下简称经合组织)一些成员国医疗和制药工作者劳动活动法律基础的研究结果。作者提供了医疗保健部门劳动规制模式的一般特征和具体特点。本文对立法和执法进行了分析。因此,欧洲(大陆)和英美模式脱颖而出,它们在监管方向上有所不同。第一种模式的特点是劳动规制的社会取向和通过准国家控制和监督机构对纪律责任问题进行公法规制。而第二种模式则为劳动关系当事人在建立工作条件和通过自我监管的专业组织对纪律责任问题进行私法监管方面提供了更多的自主权。第二种模式更加灵活,允许更自由地与医疗和制药人员建立劳动关系,有助于医疗服务市场的发展和卫生保健系统的效率。该条明确指出,在哈萨克斯坦共和国的立法中有必要接受个别机构以及有关国家的劳动和医疗法规范。特别是,需要制定一部独立的法律,参照有关医疗专业的外国法律,规范医疗和制药工作人员的法律地位,以便区分确定具体适用纪律措施、遵守职业道德和质量标准的规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信