7. Spatio-physical Power and Social Control Strategies of the Colonial State in Africa: The Case of CDC Workers’ Camps in Cameroon

Liora Bigon
{"title":"7. Spatio-physical Power and Social Control Strategies of the Colonial State in Africa: The Case of CDC Workers’ Camps in Cameroon","authors":"Liora Bigon","doi":"10.1515/9783110601183-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the many indelible imprints of European colonialism on the landscape of African countries are company towns. Defined as settlements built, owned and operated by corporations or individual investors, company towns have been influential in countries undergoing rapid economic development. As an instrument of “economic pioneering”, these towns played a major role in opening up previously unexploited regions in Europe and North America from the eighteenth to the early nineteenth century. In Africa, these towns were built and used by colonial authorities not only to open up previously unexploited areas but also as instruments of power and social engineering. In the first instance, company towns, and especially workers’ camps, were employed to articulate the power of colonial authorities in built space. In the second instance, company towns and the concomitant lifestyle-change they engendered were used as a conduit for transmitting Eurocentric ideals of work and general conduct to the worker. Despite their presence as a conspicuous feature of the landscape, company towns remain a largely ignored topic in academic discourse in Cameroon and other erstwhile colonial states. Consequently, many questions about company towns are yet to be answered. What is their form and function in developing countries? In what ways did/do they contribute to the realization of colonial/postcolonial development goals? This chapter seeks to address these questions. In particular, it employs workers’ camps and company towns of the Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC) to show how such facilities were, and continue to serve as, tools of power and social control in a developing country.","PeriodicalId":306660,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Housing in (Post-)Colonial Africa","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Housing in (Post-)Colonial Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110601183-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the many indelible imprints of European colonialism on the landscape of African countries are company towns. Defined as settlements built, owned and operated by corporations or individual investors, company towns have been influential in countries undergoing rapid economic development. As an instrument of “economic pioneering”, these towns played a major role in opening up previously unexploited regions in Europe and North America from the eighteenth to the early nineteenth century. In Africa, these towns were built and used by colonial authorities not only to open up previously unexploited areas but also as instruments of power and social engineering. In the first instance, company towns, and especially workers’ camps, were employed to articulate the power of colonial authorities in built space. In the second instance, company towns and the concomitant lifestyle-change they engendered were used as a conduit for transmitting Eurocentric ideals of work and general conduct to the worker. Despite their presence as a conspicuous feature of the landscape, company towns remain a largely ignored topic in academic discourse in Cameroon and other erstwhile colonial states. Consequently, many questions about company towns are yet to be answered. What is their form and function in developing countries? In what ways did/do they contribute to the realization of colonial/postcolonial development goals? This chapter seeks to address these questions. In particular, it employs workers’ camps and company towns of the Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC) to show how such facilities were, and continue to serve as, tools of power and social control in a developing country.
7. 非洲殖民国家的空间-物质权力和社会控制策略:以喀麦隆CDC工人营地为例
在非洲国家的景观上,欧洲殖民主义留下了许多不可磨灭的印记,其中包括公司城镇。公司城被定义为由公司或个人投资者建造、拥有和经营的定居点,在经济快速发展的国家具有影响力。从18世纪到19世纪初,作为“经济开拓”的工具,这些城镇在开拓欧洲和北美以前未开发的地区方面发挥了重要作用。在非洲,殖民当局建造和使用这些城镇不仅是为了开发以前未开发的地区,而且也是作为权力和社会工程的工具。首先,公司城镇,尤其是工人营地,被用来在建筑空间中表达殖民当局的权力。在第二种情况下,公司城镇和随之而来的生活方式的改变被用作向工人传递以欧洲为中心的工作理想和一般行为的渠道。尽管公司镇的存在是当地的一个显著特征,但在喀麦隆和其他前殖民地国家的学术讨论中,公司镇仍然是一个很大程度上被忽视的话题。因此,有关公司城的许多问题尚未得到解答。它们在发展中国家的形式和功能是什么?他们在哪些方面为实现殖民/后殖民发展目标作出了贡献?本章试图解决这些问题。特别是,它使用喀麦隆发展公司(CDC)的工人营地和公司城镇来展示这些设施如何在发展中国家成为并继续成为权力和社会控制的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信