Towards a Framework on the Security Requirements for Electronic Voting Protocols

L. Langer, Axel Schmidt, J. Buchmann, M. Volkamer, Alexander Stolfik
{"title":"Towards a Framework on the Security Requirements for Electronic Voting Protocols","authors":"L. Langer, Axel Schmidt, J. Buchmann, M. Volkamer, Alexander Stolfik","doi":"10.1109/RE-VOTE.2009.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic voting schemes are expected to meet the basic security requirements for electronic voting. However, very different opinions about these requirements exist in the e-voting community. This is due to the fact that the security requirements comprise different levels at which they can be met. For example, universal verifiability may, or may not, include verifying eligibility of the voters who participated in the election. This paper provides definitions of different levels of election secrecy and verifiability. We also investigate whether there exists an order for the different levels and provide adversary models. The resulting compilation is useful since it may not be necessary, or even possible, to achieve the maximum level for all the security requirements in parallel. Thus, appropriate levels of the requirements can be selected for different types of elections, e.g. parliamentary elections vs. elections in associations.","PeriodicalId":432365,"journal":{"name":"2009 First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for e-Voting Systems","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1899-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for e-Voting Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE-VOTE.2009.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Electronic voting schemes are expected to meet the basic security requirements for electronic voting. However, very different opinions about these requirements exist in the e-voting community. This is due to the fact that the security requirements comprise different levels at which they can be met. For example, universal verifiability may, or may not, include verifying eligibility of the voters who participated in the election. This paper provides definitions of different levels of election secrecy and verifiability. We also investigate whether there exists an order for the different levels and provide adversary models. The resulting compilation is useful since it may not be necessary, or even possible, to achieve the maximum level for all the security requirements in parallel. Thus, appropriate levels of the requirements can be selected for different types of elections, e.g. parliamentary elections vs. elections in associations.
电子投票协议安全要求框架研究
电子投票计划预期可符合电子投票的基本保安要求。然而,在电子投票社区中,对这些要求存在着非常不同的意见。这是因为安全需求包含可以满足的不同级别。例如,普遍可验证性可能包括,也可能不包括,验证参加选举的选民的资格。本文给出了不同级别的选举保密性和可验证性的定义。我们还研究了是否存在不同级别的顺序,并提供了对手模型。结果编译是有用的,因为它可能没有必要,甚至不可能同时达到所有安全需求的最大级别。因此,可以为不同类型的选举选择适当的要求水平,例如议会选举与协会选举。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信