Incentivizing Crowdsourced Workers via Truth Detection

Chao Huang, Haoran Yu, Jianwei Huang, R. Berry
{"title":"Incentivizing Crowdsourced Workers via Truth Detection","authors":"Chao Huang, Haoran Yu, Jianwei Huang, R. Berry","doi":"10.1109/GlobalSIP45357.2019.8969240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsourcing platforms often want to incentivize workers to finish tasks with high quality and truthfully report their solutions. A high quality solution requires a worker to exert effort; a platform can motivate such effort exertion and truthful reporting by providing a reward. We propose a novel rewarding mechanism based on using a truth detection technology, which can verify the correctness of workers’ responses to questions with an imperfect accuracy (e.g., questions regarding whether the workers exert effort finishing the tasks and whether they truthfully report their solutions). We model the interactions between the platform and workers as a two-stage Stackelberg game. In Stage I, the platform optimizes the reward design associated with truth detection to maximize its payoff. In Stage II, the workers decide their effort levels and reporting strategies to maximize their payoffs (which depend on the output of the truth detection). We analyze the game’s equilibrium and show that as the truth detection accuracy improves, the platform should incentivize more workers to exert effort finishing the tasks and truthfully report their solutions. Moreover, our mechanism performs well even when the detection accuracy is not very high. A 60% accurate detection can yield a platform payoff that is more than 85% of the maximum achieved under perfect (100% accurate) detection.","PeriodicalId":221378,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobalSIP45357.2019.8969240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Crowdsourcing platforms often want to incentivize workers to finish tasks with high quality and truthfully report their solutions. A high quality solution requires a worker to exert effort; a platform can motivate such effort exertion and truthful reporting by providing a reward. We propose a novel rewarding mechanism based on using a truth detection technology, which can verify the correctness of workers’ responses to questions with an imperfect accuracy (e.g., questions regarding whether the workers exert effort finishing the tasks and whether they truthfully report their solutions). We model the interactions between the platform and workers as a two-stage Stackelberg game. In Stage I, the platform optimizes the reward design associated with truth detection to maximize its payoff. In Stage II, the workers decide their effort levels and reporting strategies to maximize their payoffs (which depend on the output of the truth detection). We analyze the game’s equilibrium and show that as the truth detection accuracy improves, the platform should incentivize more workers to exert effort finishing the tasks and truthfully report their solutions. Moreover, our mechanism performs well even when the detection accuracy is not very high. A 60% accurate detection can yield a platform payoff that is more than 85% of the maximum achieved under perfect (100% accurate) detection.
通过真相检测激励众包员工
众包平台通常希望激励员工高质量地完成任务,并如实报告他们的解决方案。一个高质量的解决方案需要工人付出努力;平台可以通过提供奖励来激励这种努力、努力和如实报道。我们提出了一种基于真值检测技术的奖励机制,该机制可以不完全准确地验证工人对问题(例如,关于工人是否努力完成任务以及他们是否如实报告其解决方案的问题)的回答的正确性。我们将平台和员工之间的互动建模为两阶段的Stackelberg博弈。在第一阶段,平台优化了与测谎相关的奖励设计,使其收益最大化。在第二阶段,工人决定他们的努力水平和报告策略,以最大化他们的回报(这取决于真相检测的输出)。我们分析了博弈的均衡性,发现随着真值检测准确率的提高,平台应该激励更多的员工努力完成任务并如实报告他们的解决方案。此外,即使在检测精度不是很高的情况下,我们的机制也表现良好。60%的准确检测可以为平台带来超过完美(100%准确)检测下最大收益的85%的回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信