Models of S-phase determination in lymphomas from flow cytometric DNA content histograms: comparison with the bromodeoxyuridine labeling index.

Hematologic pathology Pub Date : 1991-01-01
P Beauregard, T E Witzig, P J Kurtin, P R Greipp, M J Stenson, J A Katzmann, T M Habermann, H S Wieand
{"title":"Models of S-phase determination in lymphomas from flow cytometric DNA content histograms: comparison with the bromodeoxyuridine labeling index.","authors":"P Beauregard,&nbsp;T E Witzig,&nbsp;P J Kurtin,&nbsp;P R Greipp,&nbsp;M J Stenson,&nbsp;J A Katzmann,&nbsp;T M Habermann,&nbsp;H S Wieand","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The estimated S-phase fraction (%S) of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas has been demonstrated to be of prognostic value. The %S can be determined by labeling index (LI) techniques or by various mathematical models applied to DNA content histograms. We performed DNA content analysis and a slide-based bromodeoxyuridine immunofluorescence LI on split samples from 117 biopsy specimens suspicious for lymphoma. The LI was compared with the %S determined by two computer models (rectangular and polynomial) with and without debris subtraction, and a manual gates computer model. In the 93 DNA diploid cases, the rectangular models had the highest correlation with the LI (R = 0.88). In the 24 aneuploid cases, the manual gates model was the most useful because of a high correlation with the LI (R = 0.70) and its ability to be used in most cases (23/24). The polynomial models had limited usefulness because they generally gave a higher %S than the LI and could be fitted in less than half of the DNA aneuploid histograms. These results suggest that in situations where the LI is not possible, an accurate %S estimate can usually be obtained with either a rectangular or manual gates model.</p>","PeriodicalId":77160,"journal":{"name":"Hematologic pathology","volume":"5 4","pages":"177-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematologic pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimated S-phase fraction (%S) of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas has been demonstrated to be of prognostic value. The %S can be determined by labeling index (LI) techniques or by various mathematical models applied to DNA content histograms. We performed DNA content analysis and a slide-based bromodeoxyuridine immunofluorescence LI on split samples from 117 biopsy specimens suspicious for lymphoma. The LI was compared with the %S determined by two computer models (rectangular and polynomial) with and without debris subtraction, and a manual gates computer model. In the 93 DNA diploid cases, the rectangular models had the highest correlation with the LI (R = 0.88). In the 24 aneuploid cases, the manual gates model was the most useful because of a high correlation with the LI (R = 0.70) and its ability to be used in most cases (23/24). The polynomial models had limited usefulness because they generally gave a higher %S than the LI and could be fitted in less than half of the DNA aneuploid histograms. These results suggest that in situations where the LI is not possible, an accurate %S estimate can usually be obtained with either a rectangular or manual gates model.

流式细胞DNA含量直方图测定淋巴瘤s期的模型:与溴脱氧尿苷标记指数的比较。
非霍奇金淋巴瘤的估计S期分数(%S)已被证明具有预后价值。%S可以通过标记指数(LI)技术或应用于DNA含量直方图的各种数学模型来确定。我们对117例疑似淋巴瘤的活检标本进行了DNA含量分析和基于载玻片的溴脱氧尿嘧啶免疫荧光LI。将LI与两种计算机模型(矩形和多项式)确定的%S进行比较,其中包括有和没有碎片减法,以及手动门计算机模型。在93例DNA二倍体病例中,矩形模型与LI的相关性最高(R = 0.88)。在24个非整倍体病例中,人工门模型是最有用的,因为它与LI高度相关(R = 0.70),并且在大多数情况下(23/24)都能被使用。多项式模型的有用性有限,因为它们通常给出比LI更高的%S,并且可以在不到一半的DNA非整倍体直方图中进行拟合。这些结果表明,在LI不可能的情况下,通常可以通过矩形或手动门模型获得准确的%S估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信