‘Turn to the letter M’: index(ing) and the science of assorting in Marianne Moore’s Observations

Rebecca Bradburn
{"title":"‘Turn to the letter M’: index(ing) and the science of assorting in Marianne Moore’s Observations","authors":"Rebecca Bradburn","doi":"10.3828/indexer.2021.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nReaders and critics rarely consider the end-pages of texts, skipping over the indexes and flyleaves in favour of the poems themselves, and the same is true of the poet-authored index to Marianne Moore’s 1924 Observations. To overlook Moore’s index, however, would be to (dis)miss its playful self-referentiality, the manner in which it works to simultaneously focus on, and distract from, the poems themselves. Taking Moore’s ‘Index’ to Observations as a starting point for thinking about both the poetry and the problematics of Moore’s indexical experiments, the article begins by asking how the process of reading Moore’s index might simultaneously inform and distort the experience of reading Observations itself, both for the reader and for Moore. In so doing, it considers the overlapping roles of reader and self-editor Moore that begins to play through the process of composing an index, revealing the manner in which (for reader and writer alike) the process of reading becomes one of selecting. Yet this process also becomes a process of dismantling and - implicitly - metonymizing, until the question becomes as follows: if poems are anatomized into a collection of constituent parts, can part lead back to whole? Far more than a marginal textual supplement, the index of Observations forms a fundamental, if ultimately abandoned, part of Moore’s poetic experimentation, and one that allows us to reconsider the trajectory of Moore’s poetic career.","PeriodicalId":302236,"journal":{"name":"The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 39, Issue 2","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 39, Issue 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.2021.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Readers and critics rarely consider the end-pages of texts, skipping over the indexes and flyleaves in favour of the poems themselves, and the same is true of the poet-authored index to Marianne Moore’s 1924 Observations. To overlook Moore’s index, however, would be to (dis)miss its playful self-referentiality, the manner in which it works to simultaneously focus on, and distract from, the poems themselves. Taking Moore’s ‘Index’ to Observations as a starting point for thinking about both the poetry and the problematics of Moore’s indexical experiments, the article begins by asking how the process of reading Moore’s index might simultaneously inform and distort the experience of reading Observations itself, both for the reader and for Moore. In so doing, it considers the overlapping roles of reader and self-editor Moore that begins to play through the process of composing an index, revealing the manner in which (for reader and writer alike) the process of reading becomes one of selecting. Yet this process also becomes a process of dismantling and - implicitly - metonymizing, until the question becomes as follows: if poems are anatomized into a collection of constituent parts, can part lead back to whole? Far more than a marginal textual supplement, the index of Observations forms a fundamental, if ultimately abandoned, part of Moore’s poetic experimentation, and one that allows us to reconsider the trajectory of Moore’s poetic career.
“翻到字母M”:玛丽安·摩尔的《观察》中的索引(索引)和分类科学
读者和评论家很少考虑文本的最后几页,跳过索引和扉页,只关注诗歌本身,玛丽安·摩尔1924年发表的《观察》中由诗人撰写的索引也是如此。然而,如果忽视摩尔的索引,就会错过它有趣的自我参照,即它同时关注和分散诗歌本身的方式。以摩尔的“观察索引”为出发点,思考摩尔索引实验的诗歌和问题,文章首先询问阅读摩尔索引的过程如何同时告知和扭曲阅读观察本身的经验,无论是对读者还是对摩尔。在这样做的过程中,它考虑了读者和自我编辑摩尔的重叠角色,这些角色开始在组成索引的过程中发挥作用,揭示了(对读者和作者一样)阅读过程成为选择过程的方式。然而,这个过程也变成了一个拆解和(含蓄地)转喻的过程,直到问题变成这样:如果诗歌被解剖成一个组成部分的集合,部分能回到整体吗?《观察》的索引远不止是一个边缘的文本补充,它构成了摩尔诗歌实验的一个基本部分,如果最终被抛弃的话,它让我们重新思考摩尔诗歌生涯的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信