Misbeliefs and Biases in Health-Related Searches

Alexander Bondarenko, Ekaterina Shirshakova, M. Driker, Matthias Hagen, Pavel Braslavski
{"title":"Misbeliefs and Biases in Health-Related Searches","authors":"Alexander Bondarenko, Ekaterina Shirshakova, M. Driker, Matthias Hagen, Pavel Braslavski","doi":"10.1145/3459637.3482141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality of search engine results returned to health-related questions is very critical, since a searcher may directly trust any suggestion in the top results. We analyze search questions that mention diseases / symptoms and remedies that are potential health-related misbeliefs. Using lists of medical and alternative medicine terms, we extract health-related search questions from 1.5~billion questions submitted to Yandex. As an initial study, we sample 30 frequent questions that contain a disease--remedy pair like \"Can hepatitis be cured with milk thistle?\". For each question, we carefully identify a ground truth answer in the medical literature and annotate the top-10 Yandex search result snippets as confirming the belief, rejecting it, or giving no answer. Our analysis shows that about 44%~of the snippets (that users may simply interpret as definitive answers!) confirm some untrue beliefs and are wrong, and only few include health risk warnings about using toxic plants.","PeriodicalId":405296,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3459637.3482141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Quality of search engine results returned to health-related questions is very critical, since a searcher may directly trust any suggestion in the top results. We analyze search questions that mention diseases / symptoms and remedies that are potential health-related misbeliefs. Using lists of medical and alternative medicine terms, we extract health-related search questions from 1.5~billion questions submitted to Yandex. As an initial study, we sample 30 frequent questions that contain a disease--remedy pair like "Can hepatitis be cured with milk thistle?". For each question, we carefully identify a ground truth answer in the medical literature and annotate the top-10 Yandex search result snippets as confirming the belief, rejecting it, or giving no answer. Our analysis shows that about 44%~of the snippets (that users may simply interpret as definitive answers!) confirm some untrue beliefs and are wrong, and only few include health risk warnings about using toxic plants.
健康相关搜索中的错误观念和偏见
健康相关问题的搜索引擎结果的质量非常关键,因为搜索者可能会直接相信顶部结果中的任何建议。我们分析那些提到疾病/症状和治疗方法的搜索问题,这些问题可能是与健康有关的误解。使用医学和替代医学术语列表,我们从提交到Yandex的15 ~亿个问题中提取与健康相关的搜索问题。作为初步研究,我们选取了30个常见的问题,这些问题都包含一种疾病——治疗对,比如“水飞蓟能治好肝炎吗?”对于每个问题,我们仔细地在医学文献中找出一个基本的真实答案,并将Yandex搜索结果的前10个片段注释为确认信念、拒绝信念或不给出答案。我们的分析表明,大约44%的片段(用户可能会简单地将其解释为明确的答案!)证实了一些不真实的信念,并且是错误的,只有少数包括使用有毒植物的健康风险警告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信