Dynamic Behavior Assessment of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Under Finite Set Model Predictive Controllers and Field-Oriented Control

Mahmoud Ali Khames, Abdelsalam A. Ahmed, A. Omara, E. Rashad
{"title":"Dynamic Behavior Assessment of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Under Finite Set Model Predictive Controllers and Field-Oriented Control","authors":"Mahmoud Ali Khames, Abdelsalam A. Ahmed, A. Omara, E. Rashad","doi":"10.1109/MEPCON50283.2021.9686258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an impartial comparison of the dynamic behavior of permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) under three control techniques i.e., model predictive current control (MPCC), model predictive direct speed control (MPDSC) and field-oriented control (FOC). In MPCC, the voltage vectors applied to the inverter are determined by minimizing a cost function comprising the error in currents; whereas, in MPDSC, the voltage vectors applied to the inverter are determined according to minimization of cost function which includes speed and current errors. In MPCC, PI controller is used to regulate the speed, whereas in the MPDSC, there are no PI controllers. When the FOC is applied, modulated voltage vectors are determined according to three PI controllers for speed and current control. Most crucial implementation issues, which affects the dynamic performance of PMSMs, are addressed during the comparison between three control techniques. These issues include delay time, switching frequency and parameters mismatch. The delay time, due to the large number of calculations, is compensated by predicting the state variables two sampling intervals ahead. Switching frequency is included in the objective function to reduce switching losses. The effect of delay time and switching frequency is related to MPCC and MPDSC; meanwhile parameters mismatch is associated with all control methods. The dynamic behaviors are assessed via simulation results at different load conditions. The final evaluation was performed in terms of rising time, settling time, total harmonic distortion and average switching frequency.","PeriodicalId":141478,"journal":{"name":"2021 22nd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 22nd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON50283.2021.9686258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents an impartial comparison of the dynamic behavior of permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) under three control techniques i.e., model predictive current control (MPCC), model predictive direct speed control (MPDSC) and field-oriented control (FOC). In MPCC, the voltage vectors applied to the inverter are determined by minimizing a cost function comprising the error in currents; whereas, in MPDSC, the voltage vectors applied to the inverter are determined according to minimization of cost function which includes speed and current errors. In MPCC, PI controller is used to regulate the speed, whereas in the MPDSC, there are no PI controllers. When the FOC is applied, modulated voltage vectors are determined according to three PI controllers for speed and current control. Most crucial implementation issues, which affects the dynamic performance of PMSMs, are addressed during the comparison between three control techniques. These issues include delay time, switching frequency and parameters mismatch. The delay time, due to the large number of calculations, is compensated by predicting the state variables two sampling intervals ahead. Switching frequency is included in the objective function to reduce switching losses. The effect of delay time and switching frequency is related to MPCC and MPDSC; meanwhile parameters mismatch is associated with all control methods. The dynamic behaviors are assessed via simulation results at different load conditions. The final evaluation was performed in terms of rising time, settling time, total harmonic distortion and average switching frequency.
有限集预测控制器和磁场定向控制下永磁同步电机动态行为评估
本文比较了模型预测电流控制(MPCC)、模型预测直接速度控制(MPDSC)和磁场定向控制(FOC)三种控制技术对永磁同步电机(PMSM)动态特性的影响。在MPCC中,施加到逆变器的电压矢量是通过最小化包含电流误差的成本函数来确定的;然而,在MPDSC中,施加到逆变器上的电压矢量是根据成本函数的最小化来确定的,其中包括速度和电流误差。在MPCC中,PI控制器用于调节速度,而在MPDSC中,没有PI控制器。当施加FOC时,根据三个PI控制器确定调制电压矢量,用于速度和电流控制。通过对三种控制技术的比较,解决了影响永磁同步电机动态性能的关键实现问题。这些问题包括延迟时间、开关频率和参数不匹配。由于计算量大,延迟时间可以通过提前两个采样间隔预测状态变量来补偿。在目标函数中加入开关频率以减小开关损耗。延时时间和开关频率的影响与MPCC和MPDSC有关;同时,各种控制方法都存在参数失配问题。通过仿真结果评估了不同载荷条件下的动力性能。最后从上升时间、稳定时间、总谐波畸变和平均开关频率等方面进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信