Perceptions of Students About the Use of Plastination in Anatomy Lessons

B. Güzel, Saime Betül Baygeldi, E. Özkan
{"title":"Perceptions of Students About the Use of Plastination in Anatomy Lessons","authors":"B. Güzel, Saime Betül Baygeldi, E. Özkan","doi":"10.47748/tjvr.1117331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was to examine the opinions of first year veterinary faculty students about the use of plastinated anatomic prosections in addition to wet cadavers in anatomy practical lessons. \nMaterials and Methods: The students were shown plastinated organs and organs fixed in formaldehyde. Then a questionnaire comprising 7 questions was administered to the 100 student participants. The questionnaire responses were analyzed statistically using SPSS vn. 22.0 Frequencies software. \nResults: In response to question 1, 58.4% of the students thought that there was no anatomic difference between the plastinated organs and the organs fixed in formaldehyde. In contrast to the strong smell of formaldehyde, 88% of the students stated that the plastinates were odourless. The use of plastinated organs was thought to improve the quality of education by 89.1% of the students, compared to the negative aspects of formaldehyde. It was stated by 84.2% of the students that plastinated organs should be included in anatomy lessons due to the thoughts of the majority of the students that plastinated tissues could make a greater contribution to anatomy lessons. In response to the final question, 92.1% of the students stated that they felt no abhorrence of the plastinated organs. \nConclusion: Plastination may be especially useful for educational institutions without access, space, or the financial resources for dissection, and can emphasize unique or pathological samples. The results of this study demonstrated that plastinated samples were perceived as a useful addition to traditional resources in the teaching of anatomy.","PeriodicalId":176953,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47748/tjvr.1117331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was to examine the opinions of first year veterinary faculty students about the use of plastinated anatomic prosections in addition to wet cadavers in anatomy practical lessons. Materials and Methods: The students were shown plastinated organs and organs fixed in formaldehyde. Then a questionnaire comprising 7 questions was administered to the 100 student participants. The questionnaire responses were analyzed statistically using SPSS vn. 22.0 Frequencies software. Results: In response to question 1, 58.4% of the students thought that there was no anatomic difference between the plastinated organs and the organs fixed in formaldehyde. In contrast to the strong smell of formaldehyde, 88% of the students stated that the plastinates were odourless. The use of plastinated organs was thought to improve the quality of education by 89.1% of the students, compared to the negative aspects of formaldehyde. It was stated by 84.2% of the students that plastinated organs should be included in anatomy lessons due to the thoughts of the majority of the students that plastinated tissues could make a greater contribution to anatomy lessons. In response to the final question, 92.1% of the students stated that they felt no abhorrence of the plastinated organs. Conclusion: Plastination may be especially useful for educational institutions without access, space, or the financial resources for dissection, and can emphasize unique or pathological samples. The results of this study demonstrated that plastinated samples were perceived as a useful addition to traditional resources in the teaching of anatomy.
学生对解剖学课程中塑化应用的看法
目的:调查兽医学院一年级学生对在解剖实践课上使用塑化解剖标本和湿尸的看法。材料与方法:向学生展示塑化器官和甲醛固定器官。然后对100名学生参与者进行了一份包含7个问题的问卷调查。问卷调查结果采用SPSS vn进行统计分析。22.0频率软件。结果:在回答问题1时,58.4%的学生认为塑化器官与甲醛固定器官在解剖上没有区别。与强烈的甲醛气味相反,88%的学生表示塑化塑料是无味的。与甲醛的负面影响相比,89.1%的学生认为使用塑化器官可以提高教育质量。84.2%的学生认为应该将塑化器官纳入解剖学课程,因为大部分学生认为塑化组织可以对解剖学课程做出更大的贡献。在回答最后一个问题时,92.1%的学生表示他们对器官塑化不感到厌恶。结论:塑化可能特别适用于没有通道、空间或财政资源进行解剖的教育机构,并且可以强调独特或病理样本。本研究的结果表明,塑化样品被认为是解剖学教学中传统资源的有益补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信