Why Did China's Assertive Strategy on The Himalayan Border?

S. Surwandono, Derina Faslig Silitonga
{"title":"Why Did China's Assertive Strategy on The Himalayan Border?","authors":"S. Surwandono, Derina Faslig Silitonga","doi":"10.24076/nsjis.v5i2.820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of differing perceptions of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) has been one of the constant factors leading to the protracted dispute in the Himalayan border. Since the outbreak of war in 1962, recriminations and clashes between military forces have continued along the 3,488 km disputed area. Since 1980 both parties have continued to make efforts to resolve disputes with a fair and acceptable solution. Unfortunately, the initiations of these peace efforts have always been deadlocked. At first, in responding to India, China preferred to be passive. However, recently China has begun to respond with an assertive behavior. The deployment of army troops, military equipment, covert attacks, and massive infrastructure development was carried out by China in strategic Himalayan border. This study explores the changing of China’s assertive strategy in the Himalayas by employing offensive realism and using qualitative approach. This study has found that the changing behavior of China’s is related protecting its national interests and territorial sovereignty as well as a form of affirming the stability of China's dominance in the region. This study's results will provide an overview that there has been a shift in China's strategy for managing its border conflict with India.","PeriodicalId":252813,"journal":{"name":"Nation State: Journal of International Studies","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nation State: Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v5i2.820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of differing perceptions of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) has been one of the constant factors leading to the protracted dispute in the Himalayan border. Since the outbreak of war in 1962, recriminations and clashes between military forces have continued along the 3,488 km disputed area. Since 1980 both parties have continued to make efforts to resolve disputes with a fair and acceptable solution. Unfortunately, the initiations of these peace efforts have always been deadlocked. At first, in responding to India, China preferred to be passive. However, recently China has begun to respond with an assertive behavior. The deployment of army troops, military equipment, covert attacks, and massive infrastructure development was carried out by China in strategic Himalayan border. This study explores the changing of China’s assertive strategy in the Himalayas by employing offensive realism and using qualitative approach. This study has found that the changing behavior of China’s is related protecting its national interests and territorial sovereignty as well as a form of affirming the stability of China's dominance in the region. This study's results will provide an overview that there has been a shift in China's strategy for managing its border conflict with India.
为什么中国在喜马拉雅边境采取强硬战略?
对实际控制线(LAC)的不同看法的发展是导致喜马拉雅边界长期争端的持续因素之一。自1962年战争爆发以来,两国军队在3 488公里的争议地区继续相互指责和冲突。自1980年以来,双方继续努力以公平和可接受的办法解决争端。不幸的是,这些和平努力的开始总是陷入僵局。起初,在回应印度时,中国倾向于被动。然而,最近中国开始以一种自信的行为作为回应。中国在具有战略意义的喜马拉雅边境部署了军队、军事装备、秘密袭击和大规模基础设施建设。本研究运用进攻性现实主义和定性方法探讨了中国在喜马拉雅地区的自信战略的变化。本研究发现,中国的行为变化与维护国家利益和领土主权有关,也是一种肯定中国在该地区主导地位稳定性的形式。这项研究的结果将提供一个概述,即中国在处理与印度的边界冲突方面的战略已经发生了转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信