Motivation Matters: Corporate Scope and Competition in Complementary Product Markets

V. M. Bennett, L. Pierce
{"title":"Motivation Matters: Corporate Scope and Competition in Complementary Product Markets","authors":"V. M. Bennett, L. Pierce","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2535952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that a pure capabilities-based view does not accurately explain the competitive dynamics of increasingly common settings where firms act as both complementors and competitors. We propose that the Awareness-Motivation-Capability framework is more appropriate for these settings. We derive predictions from both a pure capabilities view and the AMC framework and test those predictions in the United States auto leasing market, where the leasing subsidiaries of car manufacturers directly compete with the same independent lessors who provide complements to the manufacturers. Although our results are consistent with capabilities playing an important role, motivation appears to be a critical factor explaining the competitive dynamics of the market.","PeriodicalId":332226,"journal":{"name":"USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"123 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2535952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

We argue that a pure capabilities-based view does not accurately explain the competitive dynamics of increasingly common settings where firms act as both complementors and competitors. We propose that the Awareness-Motivation-Capability framework is more appropriate for these settings. We derive predictions from both a pure capabilities view and the AMC framework and test those predictions in the United States auto leasing market, where the leasing subsidiaries of car manufacturers directly compete with the same independent lessors who provide complements to the manufacturers. Although our results are consistent with capabilities playing an important role, motivation appears to be a critical factor explaining the competitive dynamics of the market.
激励事项:互补产品市场中的企业范围和竞争
我们认为,纯粹的基于能力的观点并不能准确地解释企业既是互补者又是竞争对手的日益普遍的竞争动态。我们建议意识-动机-能力框架更适合这些设置。我们从纯粹的能力观点和AMC框架中得出预测,并在美国汽车租赁市场中测试这些预测,在美国汽车租赁市场中,汽车制造商的租赁子公司直接与相同的独立租赁公司竞争,后者为制造商提供补充。虽然我们的结果与能力扮演重要角色一致,但动机似乎是解释市场竞争动态的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信