DIFFERENCES IN RESULTS OF LEARNING EVALUATION OF DELIVERY CARE USING OSCE AND NON-OSCE

Een Nuraenah, Jujun Dwi Astuti, Syarifah
{"title":"DIFFERENCES IN RESULTS OF LEARNING EVALUATION OF DELIVERY CARE USING OSCE AND NON-OSCE","authors":"Een Nuraenah, Jujun Dwi Astuti, Syarifah","doi":"10.36749/seajom.v9i1.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The midwifery Diploma 3 education curriculum includes theoretical learning as wellas clinical skills that must be possessed to carry out proper midwifery practice.Learning evaluation should cover all areas including clinical skills. Delivery care isone of the main competencies that must be ensured by midwifery students. PoltekkesJakarta 3 Midwifery Department D3 Midwifery Study Program conducts evaluationsusing various methods. Clinical skills evaluation methods can be through OSCE ornon-OSCE.The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in the results of theevaluation of clinical skills in delivery care by comparing the OSCE and non-OSCEmethods.This research method uses descriptive analytic. The population in this study wereLevel II students of the D3 Midwifery study program, totaling 80 students. The resultsof this study indicate that the clinical skill passing rate of students using the OSCEmethod is 97.5% higher than that of the non-OSCE method, which is 95%. The groupof students who used the OSCE evaluation method with a mean of 3.40 and the classwith the non-OSCE evaluation method was 3.13. Based on the results of theIndependent T Test Samples statistical test, the results obtained a significance of0.001 (P value <0.005). These results indicate a significant difference between theevaluation results of the OSCE method and the non-OSCE method on the clinicalskills of midwifery students in Midwifery Care for Maternity. The results of this studyare in accordance with several other research results which recommend the OSCEmethod to be one of the evaluation methods in midwifery Diploma 3 education.","PeriodicalId":163578,"journal":{"name":"SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36749/seajom.v9i1.196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The midwifery Diploma 3 education curriculum includes theoretical learning as wellas clinical skills that must be possessed to carry out proper midwifery practice.Learning evaluation should cover all areas including clinical skills. Delivery care isone of the main competencies that must be ensured by midwifery students. PoltekkesJakarta 3 Midwifery Department D3 Midwifery Study Program conducts evaluationsusing various methods. Clinical skills evaluation methods can be through OSCE ornon-OSCE.The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in the results of theevaluation of clinical skills in delivery care by comparing the OSCE and non-OSCEmethods.This research method uses descriptive analytic. The population in this study wereLevel II students of the D3 Midwifery study program, totaling 80 students. The resultsof this study indicate that the clinical skill passing rate of students using the OSCEmethod is 97.5% higher than that of the non-OSCE method, which is 95%. The groupof students who used the OSCE evaluation method with a mean of 3.40 and the classwith the non-OSCE evaluation method was 3.13. Based on the results of theIndependent T Test Samples statistical test, the results obtained a significance of0.001 (P value <0.005). These results indicate a significant difference between theevaluation results of the OSCE method and the non-OSCE method on the clinicalskills of midwifery students in Midwifery Care for Maternity. The results of this studyare in accordance with several other research results which recommend the OSCEmethod to be one of the evaluation methods in midwifery Diploma 3 education.
使用osce和非osce的分娩护理学习评价结果的差异
助产学文凭3教育课程包括理论学习和临床技能,必须具备进行适当的助产实践。学习评估应涵盖所有领域,包括临床技能。接生护理是助产士学生必须确保的主要能力之一。poltekkjakarta 3助产科D3助产学习计划使用各种方法进行评估。临床技能评估方法可以通过欧安组织或非欧安组织进行。本研究的目的是通过比较OSCE和非OSCE方法,找出分娩护理临床技能评估结果的差异。本研究方法采用描述分析法。本研究的人群为D3助产学学习项目的二级学生,共计80名学生。本研究结果表明,使用osce方法的学生临床技能合格率比使用非osce方法的学生临床技能合格率(95%)高97.5%。采用OSCE评价方法的学生组平均得分为3.40,采用非OSCE评价方法的班级平均得分为3.13。经独立T检验样本统计检验,结果显著性为0.001 (P值<0.005)。这些结果表明,OSCE方法和非OSCE方法对助产学学生在产科助产护理中的临床技能的评估结果存在显著差异。本研究的结果与其他几项研究结果一致,建议将oscmethod作为助产学三级文凭教育的评估方法之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信