The Solution to the Financial Literacy Problem is to Educate the Young - Where are we Now?

Sharon M Taylor, Suzanne Wagland
{"title":"The Solution to the Financial Literacy Problem is to Educate the Young - Where are we Now?","authors":"Sharon M Taylor, Suzanne Wagland","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1916568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades the need for a financially literate population has grown in importance. In Australia the introduction of a compulsory superannuation scheme in 1992 signaled to Australians that retirement needs would now need to be self funded rather than relying on government funded social security. Hence in Australia it is imperative that individuals possess both the financial knowledge and capability to make sound financial decisions. The whole issue of financial literacy has been compounded by the fact that consumers are now required to make decisions in relation to an ever increasing range of complex products and services. As a means to navigate through this financial maze, there is a consensus as to the importance and need for individuals to be financially literate. Both the government and the private sector have encouraged the development of financial education programs as an important tool in remedying the current financial literacy deficient reported in the results of all the several ANZ Surveys from 2003 to 2010. The Rudd Labor Government in an effort to centralize initiatives and to improve financial literacy programs transferred responsibility for financial literacy from the Financial Literacy Foundation to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). ASIC has strongly promoted the need to develop confident and informed consumers and investors by providing quality financial education. This focus was recently reiterated in the ASIC Report 229 in March 2011 setting out the strategy for the development and delivery of initiatives to improve financial literacy levels in Australia (ASIC, 2011).This National Financial Literacy Strategy focuses on education through established education and training pathways as the cornerstone of bringing about long-term generational change in financial knowledge, attitudes and behavior (ASIC, 2011). Accordingly the government has emphasized the need for financial literacy education to begin in schools through the use of the State Education Departments mandatory curriculum. In particular this National Strategy has been developed to improve the level of financial literacy among Australian students, with a focus on incorporating financial education through the existing school curriculum beginning in kindergarten and through to year 12 students. The USA through the efforts of the Jump$tart Coalition has possibly contributed to the most comprehensive long term study on students and financial literacy outcomes. The Jump$tart Coalition has been measuring financial literacy among High School Students since 1997 and has become one of the most widely referenced resources in understanding what young people know - and don’t know - about personal finance (Jump$tart Coalition, 2011). In recent reports the coalition has found a declining level of competency in respect of financial literacy despite an increase in emphasis and coverage of financial topics in school curriculums. The reports suggest a lack of motivation and relevance to the student’s current situation may provide a reason for this recent decline.The aim of this research paper is to compare the government’s financial literacy initiatives in schools in Australia to that undertaken in both the USA and to a limited extent in Europe. The paper reports on the outcomes of these programs and suggests possible reasons for their success or failure and discusses the varied approaches used in schools when it comes to financial literacy curriculum. The paper further reviews the results of surveys undertaken evaluating such programs and seeks to comment as to whether there is a measurable improvement in financial knowledge, attitudes and behavior directly related to imbedding financial literacy in school education curriculum.","PeriodicalId":373500,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1916568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Over the last two decades the need for a financially literate population has grown in importance. In Australia the introduction of a compulsory superannuation scheme in 1992 signaled to Australians that retirement needs would now need to be self funded rather than relying on government funded social security. Hence in Australia it is imperative that individuals possess both the financial knowledge and capability to make sound financial decisions. The whole issue of financial literacy has been compounded by the fact that consumers are now required to make decisions in relation to an ever increasing range of complex products and services. As a means to navigate through this financial maze, there is a consensus as to the importance and need for individuals to be financially literate. Both the government and the private sector have encouraged the development of financial education programs as an important tool in remedying the current financial literacy deficient reported in the results of all the several ANZ Surveys from 2003 to 2010. The Rudd Labor Government in an effort to centralize initiatives and to improve financial literacy programs transferred responsibility for financial literacy from the Financial Literacy Foundation to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). ASIC has strongly promoted the need to develop confident and informed consumers and investors by providing quality financial education. This focus was recently reiterated in the ASIC Report 229 in March 2011 setting out the strategy for the development and delivery of initiatives to improve financial literacy levels in Australia (ASIC, 2011).This National Financial Literacy Strategy focuses on education through established education and training pathways as the cornerstone of bringing about long-term generational change in financial knowledge, attitudes and behavior (ASIC, 2011). Accordingly the government has emphasized the need for financial literacy education to begin in schools through the use of the State Education Departments mandatory curriculum. In particular this National Strategy has been developed to improve the level of financial literacy among Australian students, with a focus on incorporating financial education through the existing school curriculum beginning in kindergarten and through to year 12 students. The USA through the efforts of the Jump$tart Coalition has possibly contributed to the most comprehensive long term study on students and financial literacy outcomes. The Jump$tart Coalition has been measuring financial literacy among High School Students since 1997 and has become one of the most widely referenced resources in understanding what young people know - and don’t know - about personal finance (Jump$tart Coalition, 2011). In recent reports the coalition has found a declining level of competency in respect of financial literacy despite an increase in emphasis and coverage of financial topics in school curriculums. The reports suggest a lack of motivation and relevance to the student’s current situation may provide a reason for this recent decline.The aim of this research paper is to compare the government’s financial literacy initiatives in schools in Australia to that undertaken in both the USA and to a limited extent in Europe. The paper reports on the outcomes of these programs and suggests possible reasons for their success or failure and discusses the varied approaches used in schools when it comes to financial literacy curriculum. The paper further reviews the results of surveys undertaken evaluating such programs and seeks to comment as to whether there is a measurable improvement in financial knowledge, attitudes and behavior directly related to imbedding financial literacy in school education curriculum.
解决金融知识问题的方法是教育年轻人——我们现在在哪里?
在过去的二十年里,对金融知识人口的需求变得越来越重要。在澳大利亚,1992年引入的强制性退休金计划向澳大利亚人发出信号,即退休需求现在需要自筹资金,而不是依赖政府资助的社会保障。因此,在澳大利亚,个人必须具备财务知识和做出合理财务决策的能力。消费者现在需要对越来越多的复杂产品和服务做出决定,这一事实使整个金融知识问题变得更加复杂。作为在这个金融迷宫中穿行的一种手段,人们一致认为个人具备金融知识的重要性和必要性。政府和私营部门都鼓励发展金融教育项目,将其作为纠正当前金融知识不足的重要工具,这是2003年至2010年澳新银行(ANZ)调查结果所报告的。陆克文工党政府在努力集中倡议和改善金融扫盲计划,将金融扫盲的责任从金融扫盲基金会转移到澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)。ASIC通过提供高质量的金融教育,大力宣传培养自信和知情的消费者和投资者的必要性。最近在2011年3月的ASIC报告229中重申了这一重点,该报告制定了提高澳大利亚金融知识水平的举措的发展和交付战略(ASIC, 2011)。这一国家金融素养战略侧重于通过建立教育和培训途径进行教育,作为在金融知识、态度和行为方面带来长期代际变化的基石(ASIC, 2011)。因此,政府强调需要通过使用国家教育部的强制性课程在学校开展金融知识教育。特别是,制定这一国家战略是为了提高澳大利亚学生的金融知识水平,重点是通过从幼儿园开始到12年级学生的现有学校课程,将金融教育纳入其中。通过Jump$ start联盟的努力,美国可能对学生和金融素养结果进行了最全面的长期研究。Jump$tart Coalition自1997年以来一直在测量高中生的金融素养,并已成为了解年轻人对个人理财了解和不了解的最广泛参考的资源之一(Jump$tart Coalition, 2011)。在最近的报告中,该联盟发现,尽管学校课程中对金融主题的重视和覆盖有所增加,但在金融知识方面的能力水平却在下降。报告显示,缺乏动力和与学生现状的相关性可能是最近这种下降的一个原因。本研究论文的目的是比较政府在澳大利亚学校的金融素养倡议,在美国和欧洲的有限程度上进行。本文报告了这些项目的结果,并提出了它们成功或失败的可能原因,并讨论了学校在金融知识课程中使用的各种方法。本文进一步回顾了评估此类课程的调查结果,并试图评论是否在金融知识、态度和行为方面存在可衡量的改善,这些改善与在学校教育课程中嵌入金融素养直接相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信