Subjective Evaluation of Glovebox Gloves on Hand Tactility and Discomfort

P. Sung, Y. Chiu
{"title":"Subjective Evaluation of Glovebox Gloves on Hand Tactility and Discomfort","authors":"P. Sung, Y. Chiu","doi":"10.1145/3335550.3335567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the subjective effects of glovebox gloves on hand tactility and discomfort. Three commercially available glovebox gloves, namely butyl, hypalon, and neoprene in 0.015\" and 0.03\" thickness, were selected for evaluation. The subjects first performed the tip pinch exertions with 11 Newton force repeatedly (12 times/minute) for 15 minutes with bare hand or gloved hands. Then, the subjects were asked right at the end of the tip pinch task to give a numeric score of discomfort using the Borg CR-10 scale. In addition, a disk-criminator was used to perform the static two-point discrimination test (2PD test) on the volar pad of subject's dominant index finger right after the completion of the tip pinch task. The results indicate that all gloved hands increase the discomfort scores significantly than that of bare hand. The results also show that 0.03\" neoprene and hypalon gloves decreased the tactile performance significantly compared to that of bare hand. To maintain tactility and reduce discomfort during glovebox gloves usage, the results of this study indicate that butyl material could be selected since it could offer better performance for these subjective effects. In addition, thinner gloves could also be used to retain better tactility and comfort performances.","PeriodicalId":312704,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335550.3335567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study evaluated the subjective effects of glovebox gloves on hand tactility and discomfort. Three commercially available glovebox gloves, namely butyl, hypalon, and neoprene in 0.015" and 0.03" thickness, were selected for evaluation. The subjects first performed the tip pinch exertions with 11 Newton force repeatedly (12 times/minute) for 15 minutes with bare hand or gloved hands. Then, the subjects were asked right at the end of the tip pinch task to give a numeric score of discomfort using the Borg CR-10 scale. In addition, a disk-criminator was used to perform the static two-point discrimination test (2PD test) on the volar pad of subject's dominant index finger right after the completion of the tip pinch task. The results indicate that all gloved hands increase the discomfort scores significantly than that of bare hand. The results also show that 0.03" neoprene and hypalon gloves decreased the tactile performance significantly compared to that of bare hand. To maintain tactility and reduce discomfort during glovebox gloves usage, the results of this study indicate that butyl material could be selected since it could offer better performance for these subjective effects. In addition, thinner gloves could also be used to retain better tactility and comfort performances.
手套箱手套手感和不适感的主观评价
本研究评估了手套盒对手部触感和不适的主观影响。选择三种市售的手套箱手套,即0.015”和0.03”厚度的丁基、hypalon和氯丁橡胶进行评估。受试者先徒手或戴手套,以11牛顿的力(12次/分钟)重复捏尖15分钟。然后,在捏尖任务结束时,受试者被要求使用博格CR-10量表给出一个不适的数值分数。此外,在被试完成捏尖任务后,利用圆盘罪犯对被试主食指掌垫进行静态两点辨别测试(2PD)。结果表明,所有带手套的手比裸手明显增加不适得分。结果还表明,0.03”氯丁橡胶和次氯纶手套与裸手相比,显著降低了触觉性能。为了保持手套盒手套在使用过程中的触感和减少不适感,本研究的结果表明,丁基材料可以提供更好的性能来满足这些主观效果,可以选择丁基材料。此外,更薄的手套也可以保持更好的触感和舒适性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信