Teacher Self-Assessment of Feedback Practices in an EFL Academic Writing Class - A Reflective Case Study

E. White
{"title":"Teacher Self-Assessment of Feedback Practices in an EFL Academic Writing Class - A Reflective Case Study","authors":"E. White","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-0531-0.CH009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike studies of teacher feedback on student writing, research into teacher self-assessment of their own feedback practices is quite rare in the assessment literature. In this reflective case study, the researcher/teacher systematically analyzed feedback practices to clearly determine the form and kind of formative feedback being provided on student essays, and also to compare these feedback practices to recommended practice from the feedback literature. The research took place in an academic English writing course for third-year students at a Japanese university. A close examination of the teacher feedback on the first draft of 21 student essays was undertaken, and more than 800 feedback interventions were identified and coded. Results of this investigation show a number of patterns of practice in giving feedback, including; extensive use of questions in teacher commentary, very limited use of praise comments, and varying amounts of feedback provided on individual essays. Results also show that the feedback practices discovered through this investigation align well with recommended best practice. The case study positions the teacher as ‘learner' in this feedback process, and calls for similar published research describing in detail what teachers do when providing feedback to students on their work.","PeriodicalId":320077,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Performance Assessment","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Performance Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0531-0.CH009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Unlike studies of teacher feedback on student writing, research into teacher self-assessment of their own feedback practices is quite rare in the assessment literature. In this reflective case study, the researcher/teacher systematically analyzed feedback practices to clearly determine the form and kind of formative feedback being provided on student essays, and also to compare these feedback practices to recommended practice from the feedback literature. The research took place in an academic English writing course for third-year students at a Japanese university. A close examination of the teacher feedback on the first draft of 21 student essays was undertaken, and more than 800 feedback interventions were identified and coded. Results of this investigation show a number of patterns of practice in giving feedback, including; extensive use of questions in teacher commentary, very limited use of praise comments, and varying amounts of feedback provided on individual essays. Results also show that the feedback practices discovered through this investigation align well with recommended best practice. The case study positions the teacher as ‘learner' in this feedback process, and calls for similar published research describing in detail what teachers do when providing feedback to students on their work.
英语学术写作课堂教师反馈实践的自我评价——一个反思性案例研究
与教师对学生写作反馈的研究不同,对教师对自己反馈实践的自我评估的研究在评估文献中相当罕见。在这个反思性的案例研究中,研究者/教师系统地分析了反馈实践,以清楚地确定学生论文中提供的形成性反馈的形式和类型,并将这些反馈实践与反馈文献中的推荐实践进行比较。这项研究是在日本一所大学三年级学生的学术英语写作课上进行的。对教师对21篇学生论文初稿的反馈进行了仔细检查,并确定了800多个反馈干预措施并进行了编码。这项调查的结果显示了提供反馈的一些实践模式,包括;在教师评论中广泛使用问题,非常有限地使用表扬评论,并在个别文章中提供不同数量的反馈。结果还表明,通过调查发现的反馈实践与推荐的最佳实践非常一致。该案例研究将教师定位为反馈过程中的“学习者”,并呼吁发表类似的研究,详细描述教师在向学生提供工作反馈时所做的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信