Alfred Balk, The Rise of Radio, From Marconi Through the Golden Age

James A. Freeman
{"title":"Alfred Balk, The Rise of Radio, From Marconi Through the Golden Age","authors":"James A. Freeman","doi":"10.1080/10955040701313503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some cultural historians claim that eras of creativity lead to periods of commentary. Innovators like Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, and Aristophanes in Athens were followed by critics in Alexandria. Geniuses in the Italian Renaissance gave was to 17th-century annotators, theorists, and academicians. The century from Shakespeare to Milton inspired an 18th-century symbolized by Dr. Johnson’s biographies and dictionary. Whatever the truth of this generate–contemplate pattern, it seems to describe the evolution of radio programs and radio studies. The heady early days of novel shows like Amos ’n’ Andy devolved into today’s all music or talk shows; the desultory thoughts of Golden Age reviewers have expanded into voluminous modern essays on communication laws, networks, sound effects, technologies, performers, and individual series. Thus, Alfred Balk’s The Rise of Radio comfortably belongs in our age of recapitulation. His rationale for yet another study makes sense to those dedicated fans who have dutifully perused specialized volumes on radio tubes, premiums, and soap operas. Feeling the lack of “a readable one-volume narrative that portrayed in journalistic form the sweeping drama of radio history,” (p. 13), the author provides one. His admirably clear prose sums up a dizzying array of previous histories. Balk proceeds chronologically as he retells how pioneers combined with visionaries to create “a belle epoque in American culture” (p. 12). Marconi, Fessenden, de Forest, and Armstrong supplied Hugo Gernsback, “Doc” Herrold, and David Sarnoff with the mechanisms to simultaneously reach listeners almost everywhere with the world’s most comprehensive mix of entertainment and information. When the book continues with the westward migration of talent to Chicago, Cincinnati, and Detroit, a reader both follows and appreciates how the phenomenon grew. The last two sections recount the entrance of advertising agencies and the antagonism of newspapers. Next, the author reviews the individual histories of radio’s myriad genres: comedy, sitcoms, adventure, kids’, women’s, drama, music, news, quiz, and historic shows. The final section becomes elegiac. Switching his method from annalistic to analytical, the author finds much to disturb him in post-World War II developments: network splits, the emergence of television, and, finally, the disappearance of local scheduling. He backs up his claim of “a legacy lost” (p. 282) by spotlighting the negative results of deregulation and current pandering to segmented audiences: infantile or sensational news, lack of hometown or minority ownership, a flood of advertising, loss of any public responsibility, threats to free elections. His emotion inspires rather than weakens his prose. While lamenting the prevalence of current mean-spirited talk/call-in offerings, Balk writes, “Drumfires of demagoguery and demonizing debase the public discourse and, by ignoring or politically deni-","PeriodicalId":331997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radio Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radio Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10955040701313503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Some cultural historians claim that eras of creativity lead to periods of commentary. Innovators like Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, and Aristophanes in Athens were followed by critics in Alexandria. Geniuses in the Italian Renaissance gave was to 17th-century annotators, theorists, and academicians. The century from Shakespeare to Milton inspired an 18th-century symbolized by Dr. Johnson’s biographies and dictionary. Whatever the truth of this generate–contemplate pattern, it seems to describe the evolution of radio programs and radio studies. The heady early days of novel shows like Amos ’n’ Andy devolved into today’s all music or talk shows; the desultory thoughts of Golden Age reviewers have expanded into voluminous modern essays on communication laws, networks, sound effects, technologies, performers, and individual series. Thus, Alfred Balk’s The Rise of Radio comfortably belongs in our age of recapitulation. His rationale for yet another study makes sense to those dedicated fans who have dutifully perused specialized volumes on radio tubes, premiums, and soap operas. Feeling the lack of “a readable one-volume narrative that portrayed in journalistic form the sweeping drama of radio history,” (p. 13), the author provides one. His admirably clear prose sums up a dizzying array of previous histories. Balk proceeds chronologically as he retells how pioneers combined with visionaries to create “a belle epoque in American culture” (p. 12). Marconi, Fessenden, de Forest, and Armstrong supplied Hugo Gernsback, “Doc” Herrold, and David Sarnoff with the mechanisms to simultaneously reach listeners almost everywhere with the world’s most comprehensive mix of entertainment and information. When the book continues with the westward migration of talent to Chicago, Cincinnati, and Detroit, a reader both follows and appreciates how the phenomenon grew. The last two sections recount the entrance of advertising agencies and the antagonism of newspapers. Next, the author reviews the individual histories of radio’s myriad genres: comedy, sitcoms, adventure, kids’, women’s, drama, music, news, quiz, and historic shows. The final section becomes elegiac. Switching his method from annalistic to analytical, the author finds much to disturb him in post-World War II developments: network splits, the emergence of television, and, finally, the disappearance of local scheduling. He backs up his claim of “a legacy lost” (p. 282) by spotlighting the negative results of deregulation and current pandering to segmented audiences: infantile or sensational news, lack of hometown or minority ownership, a flood of advertising, loss of any public responsibility, threats to free elections. His emotion inspires rather than weakens his prose. While lamenting the prevalence of current mean-spirited talk/call-in offerings, Balk writes, “Drumfires of demagoguery and demonizing debase the public discourse and, by ignoring or politically deni-
阿尔弗雷德·巴尔克,《无线电的兴起,从马可尼到黄金时代》
一些文化历史学家声称,创造的时代会导致评论的时代。雅典的埃斯库罗斯、索福克勒斯、欧里庇得斯和阿里斯托芬等革新者紧随其后的是亚历山大的评论家。意大利文艺复兴时期的天才给了17世纪的注释家、理论家和学者。从莎士比亚到弥尔顿的这个世纪激发了以约翰逊博士的传记和词典为象征的18世纪。不管这种生成-思考模式的真实性如何,它似乎描述了无线电节目和无线电研究的演变。像《阿莫斯和安迪》(Amos ' n ' Andy)这样令人兴奋的早期小说类节目演变成了今天的音乐或谈话类节目;黄金时代评论家散漫的思想已经扩展成大量关于传播规律、网络、声音效果、技术、表演者和个人系列的现代论文。因此,阿尔弗雷德·巴尔克的《广播的兴起》恰如其分地属于我们这个重述的时代。他的另一项研究的基本原理对那些忠实的粉丝来说是有意义的,他们忠实地阅读了有关无线电波、溢价和肥皂剧的专门书籍。由于缺乏“一种可读的单卷叙事,以新闻的形式描绘广播史上的大戏剧”(第13页),作者提供了一种。他那令人钦佩的清晰的散文总结了一系列令人眼花缭乱的历史。巴尔克继续按时间顺序叙述先驱者如何与梦想家结合,创造了“美国文化的美好时代”(第12页)。马可尼、费森登、德·福里斯特和阿姆斯特朗为雨果·根斯巴克、“医生”赫罗德和大卫·萨尔诺夫提供了一种机制,可以同时向几乎所有地方的听众提供世界上最全面的娱乐和信息组合。当这本书继续讲述人才向西迁移到芝加哥、辛辛那提和底特律时,读者既关注又欣赏这种现象是如何发展的。最后两节叙述了广告公司的进入和报纸的对抗。接下来,作者回顾了广播的无数类型的个人历史:喜剧、情景喜剧、冒险、儿童、妇女、戏剧、音乐、新闻、测验和历史节目。最后一部分变成了哀歌。作者将他的方法从年鉴转向分析,在二战后的发展中发现了许多困扰他的事情:网络分裂,电视的出现,最后,地方调度的消失。他通过强调放松管制和目前迎合细分受众的负面结果来支持他的“遗产丢失”(第282页)的主张:幼稚或耸人听闻的新闻,缺乏家乡或少数股权,大量广告,失去任何公共责任,对自由选举的威胁。他的情感不但没有削弱他的散文,反而鼓舞了他。巴尔克哀叹当前普遍存在的意气风发的谈话/电话服务,他写道:“煽动和妖魔化的鼓声贬低了公共话语,通过忽视或政治否认
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信