{"title":"Investigating Turkish Pre-service English Language Teachers’ Virtual Teaching Dispositions","authors":"Cemil Gökhan Karacan, Mehdi Solhi","doi":"10.32038/ltrq.2022.31.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study sought to investigate Turkish pre-service English language (EL) teachers’ virtual teaching dispositions (i.e., social, pedagogical, expert/cognitive, and virtual/technical presences) and the extent they are related to gender, age, and teaching status variables. The participants were 84 pre-service EL teachers drawn from a Turkish university, and data were collected through Welch and Napoleon’s (2014) virtual teaching disposition scale (VTDS). The results indicated a significant difference between the scores of male and female pre-service EL teachers in both social and virtual/technical presences. However, the participants did not exhibit a significant difference between pedagogical and expert/cognitive presences. Consequently, a one-way ANOVA was run to explore the role of the age variable on the participants’ virtual teaching disposition, with the results revealing a significant difference for only the pedagogical presence and expert/cognitive presence among the participants, whose ages ranged from 18 to 20, those aged 20-23, and those over the age of 24. Finally, the results revealed a significant difference between the scores in the expert/cognitive presence of the participants who teach English and those who do not. However, no significant difference was identified between the mean scores of the two groups in social presence, virtual/technical presence, or expert/cognitive presence.","PeriodicalId":350461,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.31.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study sought to investigate Turkish pre-service English language (EL) teachers’ virtual teaching dispositions (i.e., social, pedagogical, expert/cognitive, and virtual/technical presences) and the extent they are related to gender, age, and teaching status variables. The participants were 84 pre-service EL teachers drawn from a Turkish university, and data were collected through Welch and Napoleon’s (2014) virtual teaching disposition scale (VTDS). The results indicated a significant difference between the scores of male and female pre-service EL teachers in both social and virtual/technical presences. However, the participants did not exhibit a significant difference between pedagogical and expert/cognitive presences. Consequently, a one-way ANOVA was run to explore the role of the age variable on the participants’ virtual teaching disposition, with the results revealing a significant difference for only the pedagogical presence and expert/cognitive presence among the participants, whose ages ranged from 18 to 20, those aged 20-23, and those over the age of 24. Finally, the results revealed a significant difference between the scores in the expert/cognitive presence of the participants who teach English and those who do not. However, no significant difference was identified between the mean scores of the two groups in social presence, virtual/technical presence, or expert/cognitive presence.
本研究旨在调查土耳其职前英语教师的虚拟教学倾向(即社会、教学、专家/认知和虚拟/技术存在)及其与性别、年龄和教学状态变量的关系程度。研究对象为来自土耳其某大学的84名职前外语教师,数据采用Welch and Napoleon(2014)虚拟教学倾向量表(VTDS)收集。结果表明,男女职前英语教师在社交和虚拟/技术存在方面的得分存在显著差异。然而,参与者在教学和专家/认知存在之间并没有表现出显著差异。因此,我们采用单因素方差分析来探讨年龄变量对参与者虚拟教学倾向的影响,结果显示,年龄在18 - 20岁、20-23岁和24岁以上的参与者中,只有教学在场和专家/认知在场存在显著差异。最后,结果显示,教英语的参与者和不教英语的参与者在专家/认知存在方面的得分有显著差异。然而,两组在社交在场、虚拟/技术在场或专家/认知在场的平均得分之间没有显著差异。