Resilience of Above-ground Arctic Pipelines

A. Bushinskaya, S. Timashev
{"title":"Resilience of Above-ground Arctic Pipelines","authors":"A. Bushinskaya, S. Timashev","doi":"10.21467/abstracts.93.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper first introduces and describes the basic concepts of structural resilience on the example of the simplest structural element - a rod subjected to centrally applied tensile force. The very fact of the possibility of such a method of introducing fundamentally new concepts indicates that resilience is one of the intrinsic properties of mechanical systems, such as strength, durability, reliability, and can be described in quantitative terms. The novel method of structural resilience analysis used in the paper is based on two consecutive applications of the classical reliability apparatus to assessing the individual and ensemble-wise structural resilience of a physical object. First, an estimate is made of the system reliability, designed in accordance with current design standards, using the design values of loads/impacts. After that, the reliability of the same structure is examined when it falls into a beyond-the-design state. The second step analysis is nothing but testing the ability of the safety cushion, provided by the used design norms, to withstand forces that are beyond the design limits. This analysis clearly shows that resilience is conditioned by the design code used to create the system. A very conservative design code will provide the system with a large safety cushion, and with it, high resilience. A riskier code will provide the designed system with a smaller resilience. This situation can be vividly illustrated by the case of resilience analysis of pro-sportsmen: they use their capabilities to the extreme,","PeriodicalId":176768,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts of The Second Eurasian RISK-2020 Conference and Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21467/abstracts.93.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper first introduces and describes the basic concepts of structural resilience on the example of the simplest structural element - a rod subjected to centrally applied tensile force. The very fact of the possibility of such a method of introducing fundamentally new concepts indicates that resilience is one of the intrinsic properties of mechanical systems, such as strength, durability, reliability, and can be described in quantitative terms. The novel method of structural resilience analysis used in the paper is based on two consecutive applications of the classical reliability apparatus to assessing the individual and ensemble-wise structural resilience of a physical object. First, an estimate is made of the system reliability, designed in accordance with current design standards, using the design values of loads/impacts. After that, the reliability of the same structure is examined when it falls into a beyond-the-design state. The second step analysis is nothing but testing the ability of the safety cushion, provided by the used design norms, to withstand forces that are beyond the design limits. This analysis clearly shows that resilience is conditioned by the design code used to create the system. A very conservative design code will provide the system with a large safety cushion, and with it, high resilience. A riskier code will provide the designed system with a smaller resilience. This situation can be vividly illustrated by the case of resilience analysis of pro-sportsmen: they use their capabilities to the extreme,
北极地上管道的弹性
本文首先以最简单的结构单元——受集中拉力作用的杆为例,介绍和描述了结构回弹性的基本概念。这种从根本上引入新概念的方法的可能性表明,弹性是机械系统的内在特性之一,如强度、耐久性、可靠性,可以用定量术语来描述。本文所采用的结构回弹性分析新方法是基于经典可靠度仪在评估物理对象的个体和整体结构回弹性方面的连续两次应用。首先,根据现行设计标准,利用负载/冲击的设计值,对系统可靠性进行估计。然后,对同一结构在超出设计状态下的可靠性进行检验。第二步分析只不过是测试安全垫的能力,由使用的设计规范提供,以承受超过设计限制的力。这个分析清楚地表明,弹性是由用于创建系统的设计代码决定的。一个非常保守的设计代码将为系统提供一个大的安全缓冲,并有了它,高弹性。风险较大的代码将为设计的系统提供较小的弹性。这种情况可以通过对职业运动员的弹性分析来生动地说明:他们将自己的能力发挥到极致,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信