Barthes’s Menippean Moment: Creative Criticism 1966–70

A. Stafford
{"title":"Barthes’s Menippean Moment: Creative Criticism 1966–70","authors":"A. Stafford","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197266670.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using an unpublished seminar that Roland Barthes delivered in 1966–7, this chapter considers the challenge to rewrite, re-use, and ‘re-cover’ other writers’ texts. It shows, first in Critique et vérité, then across the seminar ‘La linguistique du discours’, and finally in the 1970 essay S/Z, that Barthes was developing a creative, literary-critical, practice rather than promoting ‘la nouvelle critique’. In this spirit of creative criticism, using Kristeva, Bakhtin, and Menippus, Barthes designed his radical approach to Balzac in S/Z. An egregious reading of Barthes’s approach notwithstanding (Bremond and Pavel, 1998), three elements are identified in his essayistic rewriting of Balzac’s Sarrasine that point to creative criticism: digression, drama, and historiality. These techniques allow Barthes’s essay both to distance and bring nearer the ‘tutor-text’ Sarrasine which, written in 1830, raised important questions about the cusp of modernity, and how to write criticism as literature.","PeriodicalId":396873,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Barthes","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Barthes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266670.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using an unpublished seminar that Roland Barthes delivered in 1966–7, this chapter considers the challenge to rewrite, re-use, and ‘re-cover’ other writers’ texts. It shows, first in Critique et vérité, then across the seminar ‘La linguistique du discours’, and finally in the 1970 essay S/Z, that Barthes was developing a creative, literary-critical, practice rather than promoting ‘la nouvelle critique’. In this spirit of creative criticism, using Kristeva, Bakhtin, and Menippus, Barthes designed his radical approach to Balzac in S/Z. An egregious reading of Barthes’s approach notwithstanding (Bremond and Pavel, 1998), three elements are identified in his essayistic rewriting of Balzac’s Sarrasine that point to creative criticism: digression, drama, and historiality. These techniques allow Barthes’s essay both to distance and bring nearer the ‘tutor-text’ Sarrasine which, written in 1830, raised important questions about the cusp of modernity, and how to write criticism as literature.
巴特的menipen时刻:创造性批评1966-70
利用罗兰·巴特在1966 - 1967年发表的一篇未发表的研讨会,本章考虑了重写、再利用和“重新覆盖”其他作家文本的挑战。这表明,首先是在《批判与变革》中,然后是在“话语的语言”研讨会上,最后是在1970年的论文S/Z中,巴特正在发展一种创造性的、文学批评的实践,而不是促进“新批评”。在这种创造性批评的精神下,巴特利用克里斯蒂娃、巴赫金和梅尼普斯,在《S/Z》中设计了他对巴尔扎克的激进方法。尽管对巴特方法的解读令人惊讶(Bremond and Pavel, 1998),但在他对巴尔扎克的《萨拉辛》的散文式重写中,我们发现了三个指向创造性批评的要素:偏离主题、戏剧性和历史性。这些技巧使得巴尔特的文章既与“导师文本”Sarrasine拉开了距离,又拉近了距离,后者写于1830年,提出了关于现代性尖端的重要问题,以及如何将批评作为文学来写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信