The role of language cues in constraining cross-language activity

Susan C. Bobb, Noriko Hoshino, J. Kroll
{"title":"The role of language cues in constraining cross-language activity","authors":"Susan C. Bobb, Noriko Hoshino, J. Kroll","doi":"10.1075/EUROSLA.8.04BOB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent psycholinguistic studies provide compelling evidence for the claim that both languages are active when second language (L2) learners and bilinguals process information in one language alone. The parallel activation of the two languages occurs even when individuals are performing highly practiced tasks such as reading, listening, and speaking, and even when they are highly proficient in both languages. The presence of cross-language activity in the absence of random errors, particularly for those who are highly proficient in the L2, suggests that a mechanism of cognitive control is in place to guide the selection of the intended language. The focus of current research is to understand the basis of this cognitive mechanism, how it varies as a function of individual differences in cognitive resources, and what consequences it holds for cognition more generally. In this paper we consider whether L2 learners and bilinguals are able to exploit cues to language status that might allow them to focus their attention on languagerelevant attributes of processing or to effectively inhibit information related to the language not in use as a means to control language selection. The results of the present study suggest that it is possible to create a functional language cue for planning the L2 and bias language selection.","PeriodicalId":236084,"journal":{"name":"Eurosla Yearbook","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosla Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/EUROSLA.8.04BOB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent psycholinguistic studies provide compelling evidence for the claim that both languages are active when second language (L2) learners and bilinguals process information in one language alone. The parallel activation of the two languages occurs even when individuals are performing highly practiced tasks such as reading, listening, and speaking, and even when they are highly proficient in both languages. The presence of cross-language activity in the absence of random errors, particularly for those who are highly proficient in the L2, suggests that a mechanism of cognitive control is in place to guide the selection of the intended language. The focus of current research is to understand the basis of this cognitive mechanism, how it varies as a function of individual differences in cognitive resources, and what consequences it holds for cognition more generally. In this paper we consider whether L2 learners and bilinguals are able to exploit cues to language status that might allow them to focus their attention on languagerelevant attributes of processing or to effectively inhibit information related to the language not in use as a means to control language selection. The results of the present study suggest that it is possible to create a functional language cue for planning the L2 and bias language selection.
语言线索在限制跨语言活动中的作用
最近的心理语言学研究提供了令人信服的证据,证明当第二语言学习者和双语者只用一种语言处理信息时,两种语言都是活跃的。两种语言的平行激活即使在个人执行高度练习的任务(如阅读、听力和口语)时也会发生,即使他们对两种语言都非常精通。在没有随机错误的情况下,跨语言活动的存在,特别是对于那些高度精通第二语言的人来说,表明存在一种认知控制机制来指导预期语言的选择。当前研究的重点是了解这种认知机制的基础,它是如何随着认知资源的个体差异而变化的,以及它对更普遍的认知有什么影响。在本文中,我们考虑二语学习者和双语者是否能够利用语言状态的线索,使他们能够将注意力集中在与语言相关的加工属性上,或者有效地抑制未使用的与语言相关的信息,作为控制语言选择的手段。本研究的结果表明,创建一个功能性语言线索来规划二语和偏见语言选择是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信