BITs Come Home to Roost but No Philip Morris Moment Yet!

Prabhash Ranjan
{"title":"BITs Come Home to Roost but No Philip Morris Moment Yet!","authors":"Prabhash Ranjan","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199493746.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter studies closely the ISDS claims brought against India. A careful analysis shows the following: First, cases like White Industries v. India and Devas Multimedia v. India expose the broad and vague language of Indian BITs. Second and equally important is the fact that these cases show that none of the claims have been brought against India because India exercised her sovereign public power in good faith in order to attain an important public policy goal such as protection of the environment or promotion of public health etc. All these claims have arisen against India mainly due to bad regulation. Third, these ISDS claims also show the failure of the organs of the Indian State to be sufficiently sensitive to India’s BIT obligations. Fourth, a closer study of these cases especially of the cases brought by Vodafone and Cairn energy shows India’s hostile attitude towards ISDS.","PeriodicalId":203042,"journal":{"name":"India and Bilateral Investment Treaties","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India and Bilateral Investment Treaties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199493746.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter studies closely the ISDS claims brought against India. A careful analysis shows the following: First, cases like White Industries v. India and Devas Multimedia v. India expose the broad and vague language of Indian BITs. Second and equally important is the fact that these cases show that none of the claims have been brought against India because India exercised her sovereign public power in good faith in order to attain an important public policy goal such as protection of the environment or promotion of public health etc. All these claims have arisen against India mainly due to bad regulation. Third, these ISDS claims also show the failure of the organs of the Indian State to be sufficiently sensitive to India’s BIT obligations. Fourth, a closer study of these cases especially of the cases brought by Vodafone and Cairn energy shows India’s hostile attitude towards ISDS.
菲利普·莫里斯的时刻还没有到来!
本章详细研究了针对印度的ISDS索赔。仔细分析可以发现以下几点:首先,White Industries诉印度案和Devas Multimedia诉印度案暴露了印度双边投资协定中宽泛而模糊的语言。第二,同样重要的是,这些案件表明,没有一项索赔是针对印度提出的,因为印度真诚地行使其主权公共权力,以实现一个重要的公共政策目标,如保护环境或促进公共卫生等。所有这些针对印度的索赔主要是由于监管不力。第三,这些ISDS索赔也表明印度国家机关未能对印度的双边投资协定义务足够敏感。第四,仔细研究这些案件,特别是沃达丰和凯恩能源提起的案件,可以看出印度对ISDS的敌对态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信