Pragmatics of Impoliteness in Construction Sites: A Case study of Mwanza, Tanzania

Farida J. Washokera, Lea Mpobela
{"title":"Pragmatics of Impoliteness in Construction Sites: A Case study of Mwanza, Tanzania","authors":"Farida J. Washokera, Lea Mpobela","doi":"10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.2.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examined Pragmatics of Impoliteness in the construction sites: A case study of Mwanza region. The study based on Jonathan Culpeper’s impoliteness model (1996) and revised by Culpeper in 2005. Moreover, impoliteness strategies, reasons for using impoliteness, as well as responses for impoliteness in construction sites have been researched. The study is of the view that impoliteness strategies are applied in the construction sites so as to achieve certain goals. This is a qualitative study with the data gathered through observation, interview and focus group discussion. The data have been collected from the seven construction sites. The study concluded that all the five impoliteness strategies (Bald on record, positive, negative, mock or sarcasm impoliteness and withhold politeness) listed by Culpeper were used by the construction workers and there were reasons for using impoliteness strategies some of them were; to raise working morale, to entertain the workers and to provide simple and clear information and instruction.","PeriodicalId":204201,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.2.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examined Pragmatics of Impoliteness in the construction sites: A case study of Mwanza region. The study based on Jonathan Culpeper’s impoliteness model (1996) and revised by Culpeper in 2005. Moreover, impoliteness strategies, reasons for using impoliteness, as well as responses for impoliteness in construction sites have been researched. The study is of the view that impoliteness strategies are applied in the construction sites so as to achieve certain goals. This is a qualitative study with the data gathered through observation, interview and focus group discussion. The data have been collected from the seven construction sites. The study concluded that all the five impoliteness strategies (Bald on record, positive, negative, mock or sarcasm impoliteness and withhold politeness) listed by Culpeper were used by the construction workers and there were reasons for using impoliteness strategies some of them were; to raise working morale, to entertain the workers and to provide simple and clear information and instruction.
建筑工地不礼貌行为的语用研究:以坦桑尼亚姆万扎为例
本文以姆万扎地区为例,研究了建筑工地不礼貌行为的语用学特征。本研究基于Jonathan Culpeper的不礼貌模型(1996),并在2005年进行了修正。此外,还研究了建筑工地不礼貌行为的策略、不礼貌行为的原因以及对不礼貌行为的反应。本研究认为,不礼貌策略在建筑工地的运用是为了达到一定的目的。这是一项定性研究,通过观察,访谈和焦点小组讨论收集数据。数据是从七个建筑工地收集的。研究发现,卡尔佩珀列出的五种不礼貌策略(记录不礼貌、积极不礼貌、消极不礼貌、嘲笑或讽刺不礼貌和隐瞒不礼貌)在建筑工人中都有使用,并且有使用不礼貌策略的原因;提高工作士气,娱乐工人,并提供简单明了的信息和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信