{"title":"Modeling regional cooperation in the Balkans after 1999: European experiences and their application","authors":"D. Djukanovic, M. Dašić","doi":"10.2298/medjp2104617d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the authors comparatively analyze the development of regional\n cooperation in Europe after the Second World War and in the Western Balkans\n since 1999. They compare and contrast regional cooperation in the Western\n Balkans (with a particular focus on the period after 2006, when the\n Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe was transformed into the Regional\n Cooperation Council, and after 2014, when the Berlin Process was launched)\n with similar forms of cooperation in Europe, such as the Nordic Council of\n Ministers, the Visegrad Group, and the Benelux. Therefore, the authors\n approach a comparative analysis of the composition of these regional forums\n and their areas of cooperation with the Regional Cooperation Council, the\n Southeast European Cooperation Process, and the Berlin Process. In this\n regard, the authors state that there are more than obvious similarities\n between regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, primarily with the\n Visegrad Group, and to a significant extent with the Benelux. Regional\n cooperation on the Balkan Peninsula and between the Nordic countries is\n similar to a lesser extent, owing to the absence of the formation of the\n Parliamentary Assembly of the Western Balkans, which was overlooked in 2013.\n The authors conclude that there are numerous obstacles to establishin g more\n intensive and deeper regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, the most\n significant of which are the lack of a multilaterally accepted regional\n identity, the different interests of regional leaders regarding its\n \"originality\", the conflicted views of dominant opinions, and the\n predominant influences of various Western actors.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2104617d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, the authors comparatively analyze the development of regional
cooperation in Europe after the Second World War and in the Western Balkans
since 1999. They compare and contrast regional cooperation in the Western
Balkans (with a particular focus on the period after 2006, when the
Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe was transformed into the Regional
Cooperation Council, and after 2014, when the Berlin Process was launched)
with similar forms of cooperation in Europe, such as the Nordic Council of
Ministers, the Visegrad Group, and the Benelux. Therefore, the authors
approach a comparative analysis of the composition of these regional forums
and their areas of cooperation with the Regional Cooperation Council, the
Southeast European Cooperation Process, and the Berlin Process. In this
regard, the authors state that there are more than obvious similarities
between regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, primarily with the
Visegrad Group, and to a significant extent with the Benelux. Regional
cooperation on the Balkan Peninsula and between the Nordic countries is
similar to a lesser extent, owing to the absence of the formation of the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Western Balkans, which was overlooked in 2013.
The authors conclude that there are numerous obstacles to establishin g more
intensive and deeper regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, the most
significant of which are the lack of a multilaterally accepted regional
identity, the different interests of regional leaders regarding its
"originality", the conflicted views of dominant opinions, and the
predominant influences of various Western actors.