Topology Design of Transparent Optical Networks Resilient to Multiple Node Failures

Fábio Barbosa, A. Sousa, A. Agra
{"title":"Topology Design of Transparent Optical Networks Resilient to Multiple Node Failures","authors":"Fábio Barbosa, A. Sousa, A. Agra","doi":"10.1109/RNDM.2018.8489825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider the resilience of a network defined by the average 2-terminal reliability (A2TR) against a set of critical node failures. Consider an existing transparent optical network with a total fibre length L. The first goal of this paper is to assess the resiliency gap between the existing topology and a new network topology designed to maximize its resilience with the same fibre budget L. The resiliency gap gives us a measure of how good the resilience of existing network topologies are. Consider now that an existing network is upgraded with new links aiming to maximize its resiliency improvement with a fibre budget L′. The second goal of this paper is to assess how much the resiliency gap can be reduced between a good upgraded solution and a network topology designed to maximize its resiliency with the same fibre budget L + L′. The gap reduction gives us a measure of how close to the best resilience the upgraded solutions can get for different values of L′.To reach these goals, we first describe how the Critical Node Detection problem is defined and solved in the context of transparent optical networks. Then, we propose a multi-start greedy randomized method to generate network topologies, with a given fibre length budget, that are resilient to critical node failures. This method is also adapted to the upgrade of an existing network topology. At the end, we run the proposed methods on network topologies with public available information. The computational results show that the resiliency gap of existing topologies is significantly large but network upgrades with L′ = 10%L can significantly reduce the resiliency gaps provided that such upgrades are aimed at maximizing the network resilience to multiple node failures.","PeriodicalId":340686,"journal":{"name":"2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RNDM.2018.8489825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Consider the resilience of a network defined by the average 2-terminal reliability (A2TR) against a set of critical node failures. Consider an existing transparent optical network with a total fibre length L. The first goal of this paper is to assess the resiliency gap between the existing topology and a new network topology designed to maximize its resilience with the same fibre budget L. The resiliency gap gives us a measure of how good the resilience of existing network topologies are. Consider now that an existing network is upgraded with new links aiming to maximize its resiliency improvement with a fibre budget L′. The second goal of this paper is to assess how much the resiliency gap can be reduced between a good upgraded solution and a network topology designed to maximize its resiliency with the same fibre budget L + L′. The gap reduction gives us a measure of how close to the best resilience the upgraded solutions can get for different values of L′.To reach these goals, we first describe how the Critical Node Detection problem is defined and solved in the context of transparent optical networks. Then, we propose a multi-start greedy randomized method to generate network topologies, with a given fibre length budget, that are resilient to critical node failures. This method is also adapted to the upgrade of an existing network topology. At the end, we run the proposed methods on network topologies with public available information. The computational results show that the resiliency gap of existing topologies is significantly large but network upgrades with L′ = 10%L can significantly reduce the resiliency gaps provided that such upgrades are aimed at maximizing the network resilience to multiple node failures.
多节点故障弹性透明光网络拓扑设计
考虑由平均2端可靠性(A2TR)定义的网络对一组关键节点故障的弹性。考虑一个光纤总长度为l的现有透明光网络。本文的第一个目标是评估现有拓扑和新网络拓扑之间的弹性差距,该网络拓扑旨在以相同的光纤预算l最大化其弹性。弹性差距使我们能够衡量现有网络拓扑的弹性有多好。现在考虑一下,现有的网络升级了新的链路,旨在最大限度地提高光纤预算L '的弹性。本文的第二个目标是评估在一个良好的升级解决方案和一个旨在以相同的光纤预算L + L’最大化其弹性的网络拓扑之间可以减少多少弹性差距。差距的减小为我们提供了一种测量方法,可以衡量升级后的解决方案在不同的L '值下与最佳弹性的接近程度。为了达到这些目标,我们首先描述了在透明光网络背景下如何定义和解决关键节点检测问题。然后,我们提出了一种多起点贪婪随机化方法来生成具有给定光纤长度预算的网络拓扑结构,该拓扑结构对关键节点故障具有弹性。该方法也适用于对已有网络拓扑进行升级。最后,我们在具有公共可用信息的网络拓扑上运行了所提出的方法。计算结果表明,现有拓扑的弹性差距明显较大,但当L′= 10%L时,以最大限度地提高网络对多节点故障的弹性为目标,网络升级可以显著减小弹性差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信