Evolution or revolution to programmatic assessment: Considering unintended consequences of assessment change

A. Ryan, D. O'Mara, M. Tweed
{"title":"Evolution or revolution to programmatic assessment: Considering unintended consequences of assessment change","authors":"A. Ryan, D. O'Mara, M. Tweed","doi":"10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment in the health professions is transforming. The widespread dominance of a reductionist measurement-based approach over the past 50 years is shifting towards a preference for more authentic assessment designed to promote and support learning. Assessment as a series of individual barriers, each to be surmounted, is being discarded in favour of systems of assessment designed to scaffold learner development and ensure sufficient opportunities for achievement. The intentions of these changes are to avoid the negative impacts of previous assessment approaches, such as strategic gaming, unhealthy competition and a predominance of book study, over immersion in clinical environments. However, unintended outcomes need to be considered when planning such transformative assessment change—both for those engaged in incremental evolutionary change and for those taking a more rapid or revolutionary approach. We explore three key features of programmatic assessment: longitudinal use of multiple assessment formats, a focus on assessment for learning and collation of data by attribute for decision making. We highlight the intended and possible unintended outcomes related to these features from the perspective of evolutionary and revolutionary approaches to change. We postulate that careful consideration of unintended outcomes is essential when planning significant assessment redesigns in health professional education. Anticipating unintended outcomes might also provide both the motivation and rationale to advance assessment practice into the next 50 years—particularly in the areas of enhancements in technology and collaborations across and between education providers.","PeriodicalId":382787,"journal":{"name":"Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment in the health professions is transforming. The widespread dominance of a reductionist measurement-based approach over the past 50 years is shifting towards a preference for more authentic assessment designed to promote and support learning. Assessment as a series of individual barriers, each to be surmounted, is being discarded in favour of systems of assessment designed to scaffold learner development and ensure sufficient opportunities for achievement. The intentions of these changes are to avoid the negative impacts of previous assessment approaches, such as strategic gaming, unhealthy competition and a predominance of book study, over immersion in clinical environments. However, unintended outcomes need to be considered when planning such transformative assessment change—both for those engaged in incremental evolutionary change and for those taking a more rapid or revolutionary approach. We explore three key features of programmatic assessment: longitudinal use of multiple assessment formats, a focus on assessment for learning and collation of data by attribute for decision making. We highlight the intended and possible unintended outcomes related to these features from the perspective of evolutionary and revolutionary approaches to change. We postulate that careful consideration of unintended outcomes is essential when planning significant assessment redesigns in health professional education. Anticipating unintended outcomes might also provide both the motivation and rationale to advance assessment practice into the next 50 years—particularly in the areas of enhancements in technology and collaborations across and between education providers.
程序化评估的演变或革命:考虑评估变更的意外后果
卫生专业的评估正在发生转变。在过去的50年里,基于测量的还原论方法的广泛主导地位正在转向对旨在促进和支持学习的更真实的评估的偏好。作为一系列需要克服的个别障碍的评价正在被抛弃,取而代之的是旨在促进学习者发展和确保取得成就的充分机会的评价制度。这些变化的意图是为了避免以往评估方法的负面影响,如战略游戏、不健康的竞争和书本学习的优势,而不是沉浸在临床环境中。然而,在计划这种变革性的评估变化时,需要考虑意想不到的结果——无论是对于那些从事渐进式进化变化的人,还是那些采取更快速或革命性方法的人。我们探讨了程序化评估的三个关键特征:纵向使用多种评估格式,注重学习评估和按属性整理数据以供决策。我们从进化和革命的角度强调了与这些特征相关的预期和可能的意外结果。我们假设,在规划卫生专业教育的重大评估重新设计时,仔细考虑意想不到的结果是必不可少的。预测意想不到的结果也可能为推动评估实践进入下一个50年提供动力和理由,特别是在技术增强和教育提供者之间的合作领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信