Working Across Disciplines and Library Units to Develop a Suite of Systematic Review Services for Researchers

Nedelina Tchangalova, Eileen G. Harrington, S. Ritchie, S. Over, Jodi Coalter
{"title":"Working Across Disciplines and Library Units to Develop a Suite of Systematic Review Services for Researchers","authors":"Nedelina Tchangalova, Eileen G. Harrington, S. Ritchie, S. Over, Jodi Coalter","doi":"10.13016/2NXE-UD2D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since their inception in the health sciences field, systematic reviews have expanded into many other subject disciplines. To address this growing need, subject librarians at the University of Maryland Libraries collaborated on a pilot program in three phases to introduce researchers to the process of conducting systematic and scoping reviews. This article describes the design and development of a workshop series based on participant feedback. Assessment and evaluation techniques are shared to encourage further refinement of the systematic review service.","PeriodicalId":114226,"journal":{"name":"Collaborative Librarianship","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaborative Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13016/2NXE-UD2D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Since their inception in the health sciences field, systematic reviews have expanded into many other subject disciplines. To address this growing need, subject librarians at the University of Maryland Libraries collaborated on a pilot program in three phases to introduce researchers to the process of conducting systematic and scoping reviews. This article describes the design and development of a workshop series based on participant feedback. Assessment and evaluation techniques are shared to encourage further refinement of the systematic review service.
跨学科和图书馆单位为研究人员开发一套系统评价服务
自从系统评价最初出现在卫生科学领域以来,它已扩展到许多其他学科。为了满足这种日益增长的需求,马里兰大学图书馆的学科馆员合作开展了一个试点项目,分三个阶段向研究人员介绍进行系统和范围审查的过程。本文描述了基于参与者反馈的研讨会系列的设计和开发。分享评估和评价技术,以鼓励进一步完善系统审查服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信