Corrective Feedbacks and Their Implications on Learners’ Uptakes in Academic Speaking Class

Didik Hartono
{"title":"Corrective Feedbacks and Their Implications on Learners’ Uptakes in Academic Speaking Class","authors":"Didik Hartono","doi":"10.26486/JELE.V4I1.440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to investigate a study on corrective feedbacks and learners’ uptakes in adult EFL classroom. The study was aimed at finding the types of corrective feedbacks were used by the academic speaking lecturer, the types of oral feedbacks were the most effective in the lecturer’s opinion, the types of uptakes followed lecturer’s corrective feedbacks, and the  types of oral corrective feedbacks were mostly preferred by the students. The study employed a qualitative research design through a passive-participatory observation of patterns of error treatment in an adult EFL class. The research subjects were the lecturer and twenty seven students of the Academic Speaking Class, the English Department of Faculty of Culture Studies, Brawijaya University, Malang. The findings show that the lecturer applied explicit correction mostly (90%), compared to another five types of corrective feedbacks. Moreover, the lecturer said that explicit correction was the most effective type of corrective feedbacks. Meanwhile, the findings also show that most student applied repetition type of uptake. On the other hand, most of the students answered that their preference of corrective feedback type was repetition corrective feedback.","PeriodicalId":160899,"journal":{"name":"JELE (Journal of English Language and Education)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JELE (Journal of English Language and Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26486/JELE.V4I1.440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study attempts to investigate a study on corrective feedbacks and learners’ uptakes in adult EFL classroom. The study was aimed at finding the types of corrective feedbacks were used by the academic speaking lecturer, the types of oral feedbacks were the most effective in the lecturer’s opinion, the types of uptakes followed lecturer’s corrective feedbacks, and the  types of oral corrective feedbacks were mostly preferred by the students. The study employed a qualitative research design through a passive-participatory observation of patterns of error treatment in an adult EFL class. The research subjects were the lecturer and twenty seven students of the Academic Speaking Class, the English Department of Faculty of Culture Studies, Brawijaya University, Malang. The findings show that the lecturer applied explicit correction mostly (90%), compared to another five types of corrective feedbacks. Moreover, the lecturer said that explicit correction was the most effective type of corrective feedbacks. Meanwhile, the findings also show that most student applied repetition type of uptake. On the other hand, most of the students answered that their preference of corrective feedback type was repetition corrective feedback.
纠正性反馈及其对学术演讲课堂学习者吸收的影响
本研究试图对成人英语课堂中的纠正反馈与学习者吸收进行研究。本研究旨在发现学术演讲讲师所使用的纠正反馈类型,讲师认为口头反馈类型最有效,摄取类型紧随讲师的纠正反馈,学生最喜欢口头纠正反馈类型。本研究采用定性研究设计,对成人英语课堂的错误处理模式进行被动参与式观察。研究对象为玛琅布拉维贾亚大学文化研究学院英语系学术演讲班的讲师和27名学生。研究结果表明,与其他五种类型的纠正反馈相比,讲师使用显性纠正的比例最高(90%)。此外,讲师表示,明确的纠正是最有效的纠正反馈类型。与此同时,研究结果还表明,大多数学生都采用了重复式的学习方式。另一方面,大多数学生回答他们偏好的纠正反馈类型是重复纠正反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信