Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan, S. Nurani, Arief Budiono, S. Sasongko
{"title":"Execution of Fiduciary Collateral Based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019","authors":"Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan, S. Nurani, Arief Budiono, S. Sasongko","doi":"10.31000/IJLP.V1I2.3165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Constitutional Court responded to the existence of a debt collector who had been very unsettling by the Constitutional Court by issuing Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dated January 6, 2020. Based on the request for a judicial review of Law 42/1999 submitted by husband and wife Apriliani Dewi and Suri Agung Prabowo . Apriliani is a fiduciary who experiences direct losses as a result of creditors' withdrawal of the object of fiduciary security in the form of a car. Both applicants are declared to have legal standing in submitting a request for a judicial review. The Constitutional Court granted it with Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. In this decision, the execution mechanism for the fiduciary guarantee object was changed by the Constitutional Court as long as it was not provided voluntarily by the debtor. Previously, the Fiduciary Law allowed creditors to execute the object of fiduciary collateral themselves, but now to carry out the execution, creditors must submit an application to the District Court. However, the implementation of direct execution by the creditor without going through the District Court can be done if the debtor admits that there is a default or default in his agreement with the creditor.","PeriodicalId":104139,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31000/IJLP.V1I2.3165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Constitutional Court responded to the existence of a debt collector who had been very unsettling by the Constitutional Court by issuing Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dated January 6, 2020. Based on the request for a judicial review of Law 42/1999 submitted by husband and wife Apriliani Dewi and Suri Agung Prabowo . Apriliani is a fiduciary who experiences direct losses as a result of creditors' withdrawal of the object of fiduciary security in the form of a car. Both applicants are declared to have legal standing in submitting a request for a judicial review. The Constitutional Court granted it with Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. In this decision, the execution mechanism for the fiduciary guarantee object was changed by the Constitutional Court as long as it was not provided voluntarily by the debtor. Previously, the Fiduciary Law allowed creditors to execute the object of fiduciary collateral themselves, but now to carry out the execution, creditors must submit an application to the District Court. However, the implementation of direct execution by the creditor without going through the District Court can be done if the debtor admits that there is a default or default in his agreement with the creditor.
宪法法院于2020年1月6日发布了第18/PUU-XVII/2019号决定,对宪法法院一直非常不安的收债人的存在做出了回应。根据Apriliani Dewi和Suri Agung Prabowo夫妇提出的对第42/1999号法律进行司法审查的请求。Apriliani是一名受托人,由于债权人以汽车的形式撤回信托担保对象而遭受直接损失。两个申请人都被宣布具有提交司法审查请求的法律地位。宪法法院以第18/PUU-XVII/2019号决定予以批准。在此次判决中,只要不是债务人自愿提供,宪法法院就可以改变信义保证对象的执行机制。以前,《信托法》允许债权人自己执行信义抵押品的对象,但现在要执行,债权人必须向地方法院提出申请。然而,如果债务人承认与债权人的协议中存在违约或违约情况,债权人可以不经区域法院直接执行。