“We Charge Genocide”: Revisiting black radicals’ appeals to the world community1

David Helps
{"title":"“We Charge Genocide”: Revisiting black radicals’ appeals to the world community1","authors":"David Helps","doi":"10.14324/111.444.ra.2018.v3.1.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1951, black radical William Patterson presented the United Nations with a petition, emblazoned with the title We Charge Genocide. The document charged the US government with snuffing out tens of thousands of black lives each year, through police violence and the systemic neglect of black citizens’ well-being. While historians have tended to discuss We Charge Genocide as a remarkable but brief episode, the petition built on prior attempts to invoke international law on behalf of African Americans and resonated with later generations of black activists whose political activism transcended more limited and domestic notions of civil rights. These later invocations of the genocide charge spanned the black left, including the Black Panther Party, the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, James Baldwin and black feminists. This essay explores how the historical memory of racial violence, including settler colonialism and the slave trade, inspired an ideologically diverse array of organizations to each connect their experience to global histories of racial oppression. It stresses the internationalist and anticolonial perspective of the genocide charge and its proponents’ economic and transnational critique, thereby contributing to the historiographies of the long civil rights movement and black radicalism. By invoking international law, these black radicals connected the civil rights movement in the US to the struggle for human rights worldwide. Finally, the essay considers how integrating the local, national and global scales of racialized violence and its response enables historians to transnationalize the long civil rights movement paradigm.","PeriodicalId":205578,"journal":{"name":"Radical Americas","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ra.2018.v3.1.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In 1951, black radical William Patterson presented the United Nations with a petition, emblazoned with the title We Charge Genocide. The document charged the US government with snuffing out tens of thousands of black lives each year, through police violence and the systemic neglect of black citizens’ well-being. While historians have tended to discuss We Charge Genocide as a remarkable but brief episode, the petition built on prior attempts to invoke international law on behalf of African Americans and resonated with later generations of black activists whose political activism transcended more limited and domestic notions of civil rights. These later invocations of the genocide charge spanned the black left, including the Black Panther Party, the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, James Baldwin and black feminists. This essay explores how the historical memory of racial violence, including settler colonialism and the slave trade, inspired an ideologically diverse array of organizations to each connect their experience to global histories of racial oppression. It stresses the internationalist and anticolonial perspective of the genocide charge and its proponents’ economic and transnational critique, thereby contributing to the historiographies of the long civil rights movement and black radicalism. By invoking international law, these black radicals connected the civil rights movement in the US to the struggle for human rights worldwide. Finally, the essay considers how integrating the local, national and global scales of racialized violence and its response enables historians to transnationalize the long civil rights movement paradigm.
《我们控诉种族灭绝》:重温黑人激进分子对国际社会的呼吁
1951年,黑人激进分子威廉·帕特森(William Patterson)向联合国提交了一份请愿书,上面写着“我们指控种族灭绝”。该文件指责美国政府通过警察暴力和对黑人公民福祉的系统性忽视,每年扼杀数万名黑人的生命。虽然历史学家倾向于把“我们指控种族灭绝”作为一个引人注目但短暂的事件来讨论,但这次请愿是建立在之前为非裔美国人援引国际法的尝试之上的,并引起了后来几代黑人活动家的共鸣,他们的政治活动超越了更有限的、国内的民权概念。后来对种族灭绝指控的援引跨越了黑人左派,包括黑豹党、学生非暴力协调委员会、詹姆斯·鲍德温和黑人女权主义者。这篇文章探讨了种族暴力的历史记忆,包括移民殖民主义和奴隶贸易,如何激发了意识形态多样化的组织,每个组织都将他们的经历与种族压迫的全球历史联系起来。它强调种族灭绝指控的国际主义和反殖民主义观点及其支持者的经济和跨国批评,从而为长期的民权运动和黑人激进主义的历史编纂做出了贡献。通过援引国际法,这些黑人激进分子将美国的民权运动与全世界的人权斗争联系起来。最后,本文考虑了如何整合地方,国家和全球范围的种族化暴力及其反应,使历史学家能够跨国化长期的民权运动范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信