RE-THINKING BLOOM'S TAXONOMY BY INTEGRATING DIGITAL SIMULATION IN

Samer El Sayary, H. Mohsen, Lamis Mantash
{"title":"RE-THINKING BLOOM'S TAXONOMY BY INTEGRATING DIGITAL SIMULATION IN","authors":"Samer El Sayary, H. Mohsen, Lamis Mantash","doi":"10.54729/2789-8547.1070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the significant developments in adapting Bloom's taxonomy in architectural design studio in the last few years, in addition to the advancements in applying digital media in the education process, there is still no integrated framework that combines all threads together. The learning objectives of advanced design studio include pragmatic thinking through testing new hypotheses, evaluating and applying different parameters, and identifying appropriate decisions. These are only achieved once barriers between design studio and building sciences considerations are overcome by addressing the process of simulation across the domains and levels of the revised Bloom's taxonomy. The Design Studio and building sciences have traditionally been viewed as independent disciplines due to the lack of an integrated framework to connect them. This formulates a sound basis on which to explore the utilization of revised Bloom's taxonomy levels, adapted through the use of the process of digital simulation in design studio as a decision-supporting tool. This paper aims to design a path for the integrating building performance simulation through upgrading the framework of Bloom's taxonomy. To achieve this, the paper adopts qualitative exploratory approach of integrating building simulation software and its application in an Environmental design studio. The importance of the proposed framework is determined through measuring the attainment attributes. The results show that using this methodology in the design studio highlights the gaps in the learning process that students are facing in conventional architectural education.","PeriodicalId":113089,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8547.1070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the significant developments in adapting Bloom's taxonomy in architectural design studio in the last few years, in addition to the advancements in applying digital media in the education process, there is still no integrated framework that combines all threads together. The learning objectives of advanced design studio include pragmatic thinking through testing new hypotheses, evaluating and applying different parameters, and identifying appropriate decisions. These are only achieved once barriers between design studio and building sciences considerations are overcome by addressing the process of simulation across the domains and levels of the revised Bloom's taxonomy. The Design Studio and building sciences have traditionally been viewed as independent disciplines due to the lack of an integrated framework to connect them. This formulates a sound basis on which to explore the utilization of revised Bloom's taxonomy levels, adapted through the use of the process of digital simulation in design studio as a decision-supporting tool. This paper aims to design a path for the integrating building performance simulation through upgrading the framework of Bloom's taxonomy. To achieve this, the paper adopts qualitative exploratory approach of integrating building simulation software and its application in an Environmental design studio. The importance of the proposed framework is determined through measuring the attainment attributes. The results show that using this methodology in the design studio highlights the gaps in the learning process that students are facing in conventional architectural education.
通过整合数字模拟,重新思考bloom的分类
尽管在过去的几年里,建筑设计工作室在适应Bloom的分类法方面取得了重大进展,除了在教育过程中应用数字媒体的进步之外,仍然没有将所有线索结合在一起的集成框架。高级设计工作室的学习目标包括通过测试新的假设,评估和应用不同的参数,并确定适当的决策的实用主义思维。这些只有在设计工作室和建筑科学考虑之间的障碍被克服后才能实现,通过解决跨领域和修订的Bloom分类法的层次的模拟过程。设计工作室和建筑科学传统上被视为独立的学科,因为缺乏一个整合的框架来连接它们。这为探索修订后的Bloom分类水平的利用奠定了坚实的基础,并通过在设计工作室中使用数字模拟过程作为决策支持工具进行调整。本文旨在通过对Bloom分类法框架的升级,为综合建筑性能仿真设计一条路径。为此,本文采用定性探索的方法,将建筑仿真软件与环境设计工作室的应用相结合。提出的框架的重要性是通过测量成就属性来确定的。结果表明,在设计工作室中使用这种方法突出了学生在传统建筑教育中面临的学习过程中的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信