Minun

Jin Wang, Yuliang Li
{"title":"Minun","authors":"Jin Wang, Yuliang Li","doi":"10.1145/3533028.3533304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entity Matching (EM) is an important problem in data integration and cleaning. More recently, deep learning techniques, especially pre-trained language models, have been integrated into EM applications and achieved promising results. Unfortunately, the significant performance gain comes with the loss of explainability and transparency, deterring EM from the requirement of responsible data management. To address this issue, recent studies extended explainable AI techniques to explain black-box EM models. However, these solutions have the major drawbacks that (i) their explanations do not capture the unique semantics characteristics of the EM problem; and (ii) they fail to provide an objective method to quantitatively evaluate the provided explanations. In this paper, we propose Minun, a model-agnostic method to generate explanations for EM solutions. We utilize counterfactual examples generated from an EM customized search space as the explanations and develop two search algorithms to efficiently find such results. We also come up with a novel evaluation framework based on a student-teacher paradigm. The framework enables the evaluation of explanations of diverse formats by capturing the performance gain of a \"student\" model at simulating the target \"teacher\" model when explanations are given as side input. We conduct an extensive set of experiments on explaining state-of-the-art deep EM models on popular EM benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate that Minun significantly outperforms popular explainable AI methods such as LIME and SHAP on both explanation quality and scalability.","PeriodicalId":345888,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Data Management for End-To-End Machine Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Data Management for End-To-End Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3533028.3533304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Entity Matching (EM) is an important problem in data integration and cleaning. More recently, deep learning techniques, especially pre-trained language models, have been integrated into EM applications and achieved promising results. Unfortunately, the significant performance gain comes with the loss of explainability and transparency, deterring EM from the requirement of responsible data management. To address this issue, recent studies extended explainable AI techniques to explain black-box EM models. However, these solutions have the major drawbacks that (i) their explanations do not capture the unique semantics characteristics of the EM problem; and (ii) they fail to provide an objective method to quantitatively evaluate the provided explanations. In this paper, we propose Minun, a model-agnostic method to generate explanations for EM solutions. We utilize counterfactual examples generated from an EM customized search space as the explanations and develop two search algorithms to efficiently find such results. We also come up with a novel evaluation framework based on a student-teacher paradigm. The framework enables the evaluation of explanations of diverse formats by capturing the performance gain of a "student" model at simulating the target "teacher" model when explanations are given as side input. We conduct an extensive set of experiments on explaining state-of-the-art deep EM models on popular EM benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate that Minun significantly outperforms popular explainable AI methods such as LIME and SHAP on both explanation quality and scalability.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信