The harmony of moral education

A. Rennesland
{"title":"The harmony of moral education","authors":"A. Rennesland","doi":"10.4324/9781003104117-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I present a creative dialogue between Kant's Categorical Imperative and Tien Xia Da Tong as a play between action (Li), proclivity (Yi), and education-imperative (duty): the “moral law within” is an internal disposition to an external reality as all in harmony under the “starry heavens above”. Tien Xia Da Tong as a socio-political reality becomes possible, as I offer, through following an imperative to act in a proper way.\n For Kant, there is only one good will and it becomes the duty of each to align one's will to that. The ideogram of Yi suggests a point of convergence—a “duty imposed upon me”. The duty to act accordingly is a result of moral education: right conduct (Li) is the expression of this moral consciousness (Yi). Actions are understood through Wu Lun yet go further: The externality of goodness is rooted not merely in the relation itself (i.e. the person at the receiving end) but in an internal alignment to the good will, which begets Tien Xia Da Tong, in harmony to their moral-imperative espoused by their Ming. Hence, moral education is as a rectification of names (Zheng Ming), which justly is the activity of practical reason. Repeating an action (Li) effects an exterior cultivation and a sense of harmony in relations, yet above all it is an internal acquiescence to the good will—a disposition to goodness, to humanity, to truth. All in harmony under heaven is when all act independent of external expectation (Li), internalizing the action to a moral cultivation (Yi), a duty of alignment to the good will.","PeriodicalId":200047,"journal":{"name":"Education in an Age of Lies and Fake News","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in an Age of Lies and Fake News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003104117-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I present a creative dialogue between Kant's Categorical Imperative and Tien Xia Da Tong as a play between action (Li), proclivity (Yi), and education-imperative (duty): the “moral law within” is an internal disposition to an external reality as all in harmony under the “starry heavens above”. Tien Xia Da Tong as a socio-political reality becomes possible, as I offer, through following an imperative to act in a proper way. For Kant, there is only one good will and it becomes the duty of each to align one's will to that. The ideogram of Yi suggests a point of convergence—a “duty imposed upon me”. The duty to act accordingly is a result of moral education: right conduct (Li) is the expression of this moral consciousness (Yi). Actions are understood through Wu Lun yet go further: The externality of goodness is rooted not merely in the relation itself (i.e. the person at the receiving end) but in an internal alignment to the good will, which begets Tien Xia Da Tong, in harmony to their moral-imperative espoused by their Ming. Hence, moral education is as a rectification of names (Zheng Ming), which justly is the activity of practical reason. Repeating an action (Li) effects an exterior cultivation and a sense of harmony in relations, yet above all it is an internal acquiescence to the good will—a disposition to goodness, to humanity, to truth. All in harmony under heaven is when all act independent of external expectation (Li), internalizing the action to a moral cultivation (Yi), a duty of alignment to the good will.
道德教育的和谐
我提出了康德的绝对命令和《天下大通》之间的创造性对话,作为行动(理)、倾向(义)和教育命令(责任)之间的游戏:“内在的道德法则”是一种内在的倾向,外在的现实在“天上的星空”下是和谐的。正如我所言,“天下大同”作为一种社会政治现实成为可能,需要遵循以适当方式行事的必要性。对康德来说,只有一个善的意志,每个人都有责任使自己的意志与之一致。“夷”的表意文字暗示了一个交汇点——“强加于我的责任”。行为义务是道德教育的结果,正确的行为(礼)是这种道德意识(义)的表现。行为可以通过《武论》来理解,但更进一步:善的外部性不仅植根于关系本身(即接收端的人),而且植根于与善意的内在一致,这种善意产生了“天下大同”,与他们所支持的道德要求相协调。因此,道德教育是正名(郑明),正名正是实践理性的活动。重复一个动作(李)会产生外在的修养和人际关系的和谐感,但最重要的是,它是对善意的内在默许——对善良、人性和真理的倾向。天下万物的和谐是当所有的行为都独立于外界的期望(礼)时,将行为内化为一种道德修养(义),一种与善意一致的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信