The Interplay between Heritage Learners’ Prior Knowledge and Instruction on a Linguistically Complex Structure

IF 0.7
Melissa A. Bowles
{"title":"The Interplay between Heritage Learners’ Prior Knowledge and Instruction on a Linguistically Complex Structure","authors":"Melissa A. Bowles","doi":"10.1163/15507076-12340015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nCurrent HL pedagogy recommends focus on form approaches (Beaudrie, Ducar, & Potowski, 2014; Kisselev, Dubinina, & Polinsky, 2020) but within this broad category there are many techniques. To date only a few studies have compared HL learning gains on explicit and implicit focus on form instruction, and these have found explicit instruction to be more beneficial. The present study isolated the role of rule presentation on learning gains by comparing Spanish HL learners in a Processing Instruction condition (n = 26) who received rule presentation and explicit information about the target structure (indicative and subjunctive in adverbial clauses of time) prior to structured input, to HL learners in a Structured Input condition (n = 16) who received only structured input. Pretest/posttest/delayed posttest comparisons revealed that both PI and SI resulted in lasting learning gains, as well as a complex interplay between learners’ initial knowledge of the structure and the type of instruction, such that learners with little or no initial knowledge benefited from rule presentation, whereas learners with greater initial knowledge did not. Furthermore, data from think-alouds and retrospective interviews shows that all learners did not process the instruction similarly, and pedagogical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":424930,"journal":{"name":"Heritage Language Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15507076-12340015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current HL pedagogy recommends focus on form approaches (Beaudrie, Ducar, & Potowski, 2014; Kisselev, Dubinina, & Polinsky, 2020) but within this broad category there are many techniques. To date only a few studies have compared HL learning gains on explicit and implicit focus on form instruction, and these have found explicit instruction to be more beneficial. The present study isolated the role of rule presentation on learning gains by comparing Spanish HL learners in a Processing Instruction condition (n = 26) who received rule presentation and explicit information about the target structure (indicative and subjunctive in adverbial clauses of time) prior to structured input, to HL learners in a Structured Input condition (n = 16) who received only structured input. Pretest/posttest/delayed posttest comparisons revealed that both PI and SI resulted in lasting learning gains, as well as a complex interplay between learners’ initial knowledge of the structure and the type of instruction, such that learners with little or no initial knowledge benefited from rule presentation, whereas learners with greater initial knowledge did not. Furthermore, data from think-alouds and retrospective interviews shows that all learners did not process the instruction similarly, and pedagogical implications are discussed.
传承学习者的先验知识与语言复杂结构教学的相互作用
当前的HL教学法建议关注形式方法(Beaudrie, Ducar, & Potowski, 2014;Kisselev, Dubinina, & Polinsky, 2020),但在这个广泛的类别中有许多技术。迄今为止,只有少数研究比较了显性和隐性关注形式教学的HL学习收益,这些研究发现显性教学更有益。本研究通过比较处理指令条件下的西班牙语HL学习者(n = 26)和结构化输入条件下的HL学习者(n = 16),分离了规则呈现对学习收益的作用,前者在结构化输入之前接受了规则呈现和关于目标结构的明确信息(时间状语从句中的指示性和虚拟语气),后者只接受结构化输入。前测/后测/延迟后测比较显示,PI和SI都能带来持久的学习收益,以及学习者对结构和教学类型的初始知识之间的复杂相互作用,例如,初始知识很少或没有初始知识的学习者受益于规则呈现,而初始知识较多的学习者则没有。此外,来自大声思考和回顾性访谈的数据表明,并非所有学习者都以相同的方式处理教学,并讨论了教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书