Agent-Based Modelling for International Trade

ahmed A.okasha okasha, asmaa mounir EL-refaee, سلوى محمد عبدالعزیز عبدالعزیز
{"title":"Agent-Based Modelling for International Trade","authors":"ahmed A.okasha okasha, asmaa mounir EL-refaee, سلوى محمد عبدالعزیز عبدالعزیز","doi":"10.21608/cfdj.2022.229770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The system of the world economy has recently become more efficient and integrated due to the globalization effect. This effect results in driving the progression of both the technology and the liberalization of trade and capital markets. The technological improvements reduce the costs of transportation and communication between the countries. On the other hand, liberalization of trade and capital markets reduces the forms of unfair foreign competition . The main objective of this study is to design an agent-based modeling that unravels the role of technological improvement in changing the international trade structure between the developed and developing countries. The study also tackles the effect of capital mobility on the structure of international trade. These two objectives are achieved through proposing different scenarios. Furthermore, the proposed agent-based modeling is based on two assumptions, the Samuelson's analysis of outsourcing between the developed and developing countries assumption and the capital mobility assumption. Traditionally, technological progress is considered the cornerstone of international trade flows. The general pattern of trade flows is from the developed country, to the developing country. Applying a set of ABM scenarios on the international trade schemes revealed a general pattern of trade flows from the developing country to the developed country. This was attributed to the gradual technological shocks introduced to the developing country’s industrial sector. Furthermore, the results showed that the developing countries possess the capability of turning into new economic powers in all fields shall they properly invest in technological progress. The Gulden`s model mainly assumed that the classical theories such as the comparative and the absolute theories were the appropriate framework for trade between developed and developing countries. This study adopted instead a modern framework that was based on the product life cycle and technological gap theories which are the current dominant theories of trade flows between developed country (U.S.) and developing country (China). The general objective of this research to formulate a model of the international trade system as a complex system. mutual beneficial trade between the developed and developing countries in the international trade system. The Gulden`s model is used to study the technological change in the form of gradual multi-shocks. In addition, results will be tested and validated with real trade data. Furthermore, the impact of technological progress on the distribution of labor inside each industry will be tested according to the Solow residual of the technological impact on the effective labor force (Blanchard, 2017). experiment by (0.3) as mentioned in the first proposed model. The main indicators which were simulated in this model were capital invested in industry Two and industry One production in U.S and China in addition to the utility for each nation. The results were taken as an average value at time step 2000 over 30 runs for each tested value of the capital-mobility concept.","PeriodicalId":354519,"journal":{"name":"المجلة العلمیة للدراسات والبحوث المالیة والتجاریة","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"المجلة العلمیة للدراسات والبحوث المالیة والتجاریة","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/cfdj.2022.229770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The system of the world economy has recently become more efficient and integrated due to the globalization effect. This effect results in driving the progression of both the technology and the liberalization of trade and capital markets. The technological improvements reduce the costs of transportation and communication between the countries. On the other hand, liberalization of trade and capital markets reduces the forms of unfair foreign competition . The main objective of this study is to design an agent-based modeling that unravels the role of technological improvement in changing the international trade structure between the developed and developing countries. The study also tackles the effect of capital mobility on the structure of international trade. These two objectives are achieved through proposing different scenarios. Furthermore, the proposed agent-based modeling is based on two assumptions, the Samuelson's analysis of outsourcing between the developed and developing countries assumption and the capital mobility assumption. Traditionally, technological progress is considered the cornerstone of international trade flows. The general pattern of trade flows is from the developed country, to the developing country. Applying a set of ABM scenarios on the international trade schemes revealed a general pattern of trade flows from the developing country to the developed country. This was attributed to the gradual technological shocks introduced to the developing country’s industrial sector. Furthermore, the results showed that the developing countries possess the capability of turning into new economic powers in all fields shall they properly invest in technological progress. The Gulden`s model mainly assumed that the classical theories such as the comparative and the absolute theories were the appropriate framework for trade between developed and developing countries. This study adopted instead a modern framework that was based on the product life cycle and technological gap theories which are the current dominant theories of trade flows between developed country (U.S.) and developing country (China). The general objective of this research to formulate a model of the international trade system as a complex system. mutual beneficial trade between the developed and developing countries in the international trade system. The Gulden`s model is used to study the technological change in the form of gradual multi-shocks. In addition, results will be tested and validated with real trade data. Furthermore, the impact of technological progress on the distribution of labor inside each industry will be tested according to the Solow residual of the technological impact on the effective labor force (Blanchard, 2017). experiment by (0.3) as mentioned in the first proposed model. The main indicators which were simulated in this model were capital invested in industry Two and industry One production in U.S and China in addition to the utility for each nation. The results were taken as an average value at time step 2000 over 30 runs for each tested value of the capital-mobility concept.
基于agent的国际贸易建模
由于全球化的影响,世界经济体系最近变得更加有效率和一体化。这种影响的结果是推动技术进步和贸易和资本市场的自由化。技术进步降低了两国之间运输和通讯的成本。另一方面,贸易和资本市场的自由化减少了各种形式的外国不公平竞争。本研究的主要目的是设计一个基于主体的模型,揭示技术改进在改变发达国家和发展中国家之间的国际贸易结构中的作用。本研究还探讨了资本流动对国际贸易结构的影响。通过提出不同的方案来实现这两个目标。此外,本文提出的基于主体的模型基于两个假设,即萨缪尔森对发达国家和发展中国家之间外包的分析假设和资本流动性假设。传统上,技术进步被认为是国际贸易流动的基石。贸易流动的一般模式是从发达国家流向发展中国家。对国际贸易计划应用一套反弹道导弹情景,揭示了从发展中国家流向发达国家的贸易流动的一般格局。这是由于发展中国家工业部门逐渐受到技术冲击造成的。此外,研究结果还表明,只要发展中国家在技术进步方面进行适当的投资,它们在各个领域都有能力成为新的经济大国。古尔登模型主要假设比较理论和绝对理论等经典理论是发达国家和发展中国家之间贸易的适当框架。本研究采用了基于产品生命周期理论和技术差距理论的现代框架,这些理论是目前发达国家(美国)和发展中国家(中国)之间贸易流动的主流理论。本研究的总目标是制定一个国际贸易体系作为一个复杂系统的模型。发达国家与发展中国家在国际贸易体系中的互利贸易。戈尔登模型用于研究渐进式多重冲击形式的技术变化。此外,结果将用真实的贸易数据进行测试和验证。此外,根据技术对有效劳动力影响的索洛剩余量(Blanchard, 2017),将检验技术进步对每个行业内部劳动力分配的影响。用第一个模型中提到的(0.3)进行实验。在该模型中模拟的主要指标是美国和中国在工业二和工业一生产上的资本投资,以及每个国家的效用。结果作为时间步长2000超过30次运行的资本流动性概念的每个测试值的平均值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信