Providers' involvement of blended families in pediatric weight management programs.

K. Pratt, S. Lazorick, I. Eneli, D. Collier, J. Skelton
{"title":"Providers' involvement of blended families in pediatric weight management programs.","authors":"K. Pratt, S. Lazorick, I. Eneli, D. Collier, J. Skelton","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nFamily based interventions are the standard for pediatric weight management programs (PWMPs), yet the details of how to involve additional family members, when youth are part of blended families (i.e., step families) or reside in multiple households is not well understood. The objective of this study is to describe how providers involve blended families and multiple households in PWMPs.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA cross-sectional exploratory survey was conducted of providers at PWMPs in the United States and Canada. The survey questions included had both multiple choice and open-ended responses. Univariate analyses were conducted.\n\n\nRESULTS\n71 providers participated, representing 47 centers/clinics. The majority (96%) reported assessing multiple households, most often during the medical history. Providers reported including the primary caretakers at all known residences (59%), but not immediate family members beyond the primary caretakers. Providers reported adapting dietary (88%) and physical activity (77%) recommendations to accommodate multiple households. The most frequent adaptations included the goals at each family/household, adjustments on a per family basis or based on family resources, and making materials available to all family members. The most frequent challenges in extending treatment plans to multiple households included one caretaker/household not willing to participate or being present at visits, and inconsistency between households. Despite providers reporting that they assess multiple households, they did not have a formal interview template or form to use in assessments (27%).\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nProviders recognize the challenges and complexity that blended families present with in obesity treatment. Further research is need to increase provider assessment and involvement of blended families and the extension of goals and treatment plans to multiple homes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":358476,"journal":{"name":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Family based interventions are the standard for pediatric weight management programs (PWMPs), yet the details of how to involve additional family members, when youth are part of blended families (i.e., step families) or reside in multiple households is not well understood. The objective of this study is to describe how providers involve blended families and multiple households in PWMPs. METHOD A cross-sectional exploratory survey was conducted of providers at PWMPs in the United States and Canada. The survey questions included had both multiple choice and open-ended responses. Univariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS 71 providers participated, representing 47 centers/clinics. The majority (96%) reported assessing multiple households, most often during the medical history. Providers reported including the primary caretakers at all known residences (59%), but not immediate family members beyond the primary caretakers. Providers reported adapting dietary (88%) and physical activity (77%) recommendations to accommodate multiple households. The most frequent adaptations included the goals at each family/household, adjustments on a per family basis or based on family resources, and making materials available to all family members. The most frequent challenges in extending treatment plans to multiple households included one caretaker/household not willing to participate or being present at visits, and inconsistency between households. Despite providers reporting that they assess multiple households, they did not have a formal interview template or form to use in assessments (27%). DISCUSSION Providers recognize the challenges and complexity that blended families present with in obesity treatment. Further research is need to increase provider assessment and involvement of blended families and the extension of goals and treatment plans to multiple homes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
儿童体重管理项目中混合家庭的提供者参与。
以家庭为基础的干预措施是儿童体重管理项目(PWMPs)的标准,然而,当青少年是混合家庭(即再婚家庭)的一部分或居住在多个家庭中时,如何让其他家庭成员参与进来的细节还不是很清楚。本研究的目的是描述提供者如何在pwmp中涉及混合家庭和多个家庭。方法对美国和加拿大的PWMPs的提供者进行了横断面探索性调查。调查问题包括多项选择和开放式回答。进行单因素分析。结果共有47家中心/诊所的71家服务提供者参与了调查。大多数(96%)报告在病史期间对多个家庭进行了评估。报告的提供者包括所有已知住所的主要照护者(59%),但不包括主要照护者以外的直系亲属。服务提供者报告了调整饮食(88%)和身体活动(77%)建议以适应多个家庭。最常见的调整包括每个家庭/家庭的目标,以每个家庭为基础或以家庭资源为基础的调整,以及向所有家庭成员提供材料。在向多个家庭推广治疗计划时,最常见的挑战包括一个看护者/家庭不愿意参与或不在场,以及家庭之间的不一致。尽管提供者报告说他们评估了多个家庭,但他们没有正式的访谈模板或表格用于评估(27%)。提供者认识到在肥胖治疗中混合家庭存在的挑战和复杂性。需要进一步的研究来增加提供者对混合家庭的评估和参与,并将目标和治疗计划扩展到多个家庭。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信