Is TP53 mutation screening in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) ready for prime time?

E. Elhassadi
{"title":"Is TP53 mutation screening in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) ready for prime time?","authors":"E. Elhassadi","doi":"10.31487/j.aco.2019.03.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare incurable subtype of B-cell lymphoma characterized by t(11;14)(q13;q32)-driven over expression of cyclin D1 [1]. MCL is associated with the highest degree of genomic instability of the B cell malignancies, and TP53 mutation in particular confers a dismal prognosis in MCL with a reported incidence of 15-20 % (blastoid=29% vs Classical= 6%) [2, 3]. TP53 mutation status is the only independent molecular marker that was able to improve the prognostic value of the Mantle cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) [4]. MCL Patients with a TP53 mutation were significantly less likely to achieve a CR after first-line treatment and associated early relapse. The current standard of care, Chemo-immunotherapy with high-dose Cytarabine followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (in eligible patient), although most patients prove ineligible, have failed to overcome the poor prognostic impact of TP53 disruption [4]. Ibrutinib and Venetoclax (ABT-199) are two of the most active agents in the treatment of MCL, they have acceptable toxicity profiles and mainly are used in relapse setting. Pre-clinical models predict synergy between these novel drugs in combination. Patients who received Ibrutinib after an initial relapse had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients who received Ibrutinib after successive relapses probably related to selective advantage of resistant clone expansion [5]. In MCL, the attention should be move to the upfront treatment setting using these target therapies in high risk disease (TP53 mutated) and elderly patients whom un-fit for chemo-immunotherapy approach and phase III clinical trial eagerly awaited to support this approach. Likewise, in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) incorporating TP53 mutation screening in routine practice prior commencing therapy is paramount in the era of novel effective therapies. Younger MCL patients with this genetic alteration should be considered for specific treatment using inhibitors for BCR, BCL2, TP53-independent pathways, the Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies either alone or in combination followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the upfront setting. Chemo-free approach also to be considered for un-fit patients early in the disease course. Fit un-mutated TP53 MCL Patients should be treated with chemo-immunotherapy with ASCT consolidation if eligible and anti CD20 monoclonal antibody maintenance therapy.","PeriodicalId":320563,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.aco.2019.03.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare incurable subtype of B-cell lymphoma characterized by t(11;14)(q13;q32)-driven over expression of cyclin D1 [1]. MCL is associated with the highest degree of genomic instability of the B cell malignancies, and TP53 mutation in particular confers a dismal prognosis in MCL with a reported incidence of 15-20 % (blastoid=29% vs Classical= 6%) [2, 3]. TP53 mutation status is the only independent molecular marker that was able to improve the prognostic value of the Mantle cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) [4]. MCL Patients with a TP53 mutation were significantly less likely to achieve a CR after first-line treatment and associated early relapse. The current standard of care, Chemo-immunotherapy with high-dose Cytarabine followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (in eligible patient), although most patients prove ineligible, have failed to overcome the poor prognostic impact of TP53 disruption [4]. Ibrutinib and Venetoclax (ABT-199) are two of the most active agents in the treatment of MCL, they have acceptable toxicity profiles and mainly are used in relapse setting. Pre-clinical models predict synergy between these novel drugs in combination. Patients who received Ibrutinib after an initial relapse had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients who received Ibrutinib after successive relapses probably related to selective advantage of resistant clone expansion [5]. In MCL, the attention should be move to the upfront treatment setting using these target therapies in high risk disease (TP53 mutated) and elderly patients whom un-fit for chemo-immunotherapy approach and phase III clinical trial eagerly awaited to support this approach. Likewise, in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) incorporating TP53 mutation screening in routine practice prior commencing therapy is paramount in the era of novel effective therapies. Younger MCL patients with this genetic alteration should be considered for specific treatment using inhibitors for BCR, BCL2, TP53-independent pathways, the Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies either alone or in combination followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the upfront setting. Chemo-free approach also to be considered for un-fit patients early in the disease course. Fit un-mutated TP53 MCL Patients should be treated with chemo-immunotherapy with ASCT consolidation if eligible and anti CD20 monoclonal antibody maintenance therapy.
套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL) TP53突变筛查准备好了吗?
套细胞淋巴瘤(Mantle cell lymphoma, MCL)是一种罕见的无法治愈的b细胞淋巴瘤亚型,其特征是t(11;14)(q13;q32)驱动cyclin D1过表达[1]。MCL与最高程度的B细胞恶性肿瘤基因组不稳定性相关,特别是TP53突变导致MCL预后不佳,据报道发病率为15- 20%(囊胚=29% vs经典= 6%)[2,3]。TP53突变状态是唯一能够提高套细胞淋巴瘤国际预后指数(MIPI)预后价值的独立分子标志物[4]。TP53突变的MCL患者在一线治疗后达到CR和相关的早期复发的可能性明显降低。目前的治疗标准是高剂量阿糖胞苷化疗免疫治疗后自体干细胞移植(ASCT)(在符合条件的患者中),尽管大多数患者被证明不符合条件,但未能克服TP53破坏的不良预后影响[4]。Ibrutinib和Venetoclax (ABT-199)是治疗MCL中最活跃的两种药物,它们具有可接受的毒性,主要用于复发情况。临床前模型预测了这些新药组合之间的协同作用。首次复发后接受伊鲁替尼治疗的患者PFS和OS明显长于连续复发后接受伊鲁替尼治疗的患者,这可能与耐药克隆扩增的选择性优势有关[5]。在MCL中,应该将注意力转移到在高风险疾病(TP53突变)和老年患者中使用这些靶向治疗的前期治疗设置,这些患者不适合化学免疫治疗方法和迫切等待支持该方法的III期临床试验。同样,在慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)中,在开始治疗前的常规实践中结合TP53突变筛查在新的有效治疗时代是至关重要的。有这种基因改变的年轻MCL患者应该考虑使用BCR、BCL2、tp53独立通路抑制剂、抗cd20单克隆抗体单独或联合进行特异性治疗,然后在前期进行异体干细胞移植。对于病程早期不适合的患者,也可考虑采用无化疗方法。合适的未突变TP53 MCL患者如果符合条件,应接受ASCT巩固的化疗免疫治疗和抗CD20单克隆抗体维持治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信