Online Image Sensor Fault Detection for Autonomous Vehicles

Yizhi Chen, Wenyao Zhu, Dejiu Chen, Zhonghai Lu
{"title":"Online Image Sensor Fault Detection for Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"Yizhi Chen, Wenyao Zhu, Dejiu Chen, Zhonghai Lu","doi":"10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated driving vehicles have shown glorious potential in the near future market due to the high safety and convenience for drivers and passengers. Image sensors' reliability attract many researchers' interests as many image sensors are used in autonomous vehicles. We propose an online image sensor fault detection method based on comparing the historical variances of normal pixels and defective pixels to detect faults. For fault pixels without uncertainty, with a detecting window of more than 30 frames, we get 100% accuracy and 100% recall on realistic continuous traffic pictures from the KITTI data set. We also explore the influence of fault pixel values' uncertainty from 0% to 25% and study different fixed thresholds and a dynamic threshold for judgments. Strict threshold, which is 0.1, has a high accuracy (99.16%) but has a low recall (34.46%) for 15% uncertainty. Loose threshold, which is 0.3, has a relatively high recall (83.78%) but mistakes too many normal pixels with 18.17% accuracy for 15% uncertainty. Our dynamic threshold balances the accuracy and recall. It gets 100% accuracy and 58.69% recall for 5% uncertainty and 78.38% accuracy and 55.39% recall for 15% uncertainty. Based on the detected damage pixel rate, we develop a health score for evaluating the image sensor system intuitively. It can also be helpful for making decision about replacing cameras.","PeriodicalId":150801,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated driving vehicles have shown glorious potential in the near future market due to the high safety and convenience for drivers and passengers. Image sensors' reliability attract many researchers' interests as many image sensors are used in autonomous vehicles. We propose an online image sensor fault detection method based on comparing the historical variances of normal pixels and defective pixels to detect faults. For fault pixels without uncertainty, with a detecting window of more than 30 frames, we get 100% accuracy and 100% recall on realistic continuous traffic pictures from the KITTI data set. We also explore the influence of fault pixel values' uncertainty from 0% to 25% and study different fixed thresholds and a dynamic threshold for judgments. Strict threshold, which is 0.1, has a high accuracy (99.16%) but has a low recall (34.46%) for 15% uncertainty. Loose threshold, which is 0.3, has a relatively high recall (83.78%) but mistakes too many normal pixels with 18.17% accuracy for 15% uncertainty. Our dynamic threshold balances the accuracy and recall. It gets 100% accuracy and 58.69% recall for 5% uncertainty and 78.38% accuracy and 55.39% recall for 15% uncertainty. Based on the detected damage pixel rate, we develop a health score for evaluating the image sensor system intuitively. It can also be helpful for making decision about replacing cameras.
自动驾驶汽车在线图像传感器故障检测
自动驾驶汽车因其对驾驶员和乘客的高安全性和便利性,在不久的将来的市场上显示出巨大的潜力。随着自动驾驶汽车中图像传感器的应用越来越广泛,图像传感器的可靠性问题引起了研究人员的广泛关注。提出了一种基于正常像素和缺陷像素历史方差比较的在线图像传感器故障检测方法。对于无不确定性的故障像素点,在超过30帧的检测窗口下,我们对KITTI数据集的真实连续交通图像获得了100%的准确率和100%的召回率。探讨了故障像素值不确定性在0% ~ 25%范围内的影响,并研究了不同的固定阈值和动态阈值进行判断。严格阈值为0.1,当不确定度为15%时,准确率高(99.16%),召回率低(34.46%)。宽松阈值0.3具有相对较高的召回率(83.78%),但在15%的不确定性下,正确率为18.17%,错误过多。我们的动态阈值平衡了准确率和召回率。在不确定度为5%时,准确率为100%,召回率为58.69%;在不确定度为15%时,准确率为78.38%,召回率为55.39%。基于检测到的损伤像素率,我们开发了一种健康度评分来直观地评价图像传感器系统。它也可以帮助你决定是否更换相机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信