A future role for loop ileostomy in colorectal surgery?

The Netherlands journal of surgery Pub Date : 1991-10-01
R J Welten, A Jansen, H D van de Pavoordt
{"title":"A future role for loop ileostomy in colorectal surgery?","authors":"R J Welten,&nbsp;A Jansen,&nbsp;H D van de Pavoordt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty patients underwent a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Elective ileostomy was performed in 23 patients to protect a potentially vulnerable colorectal anastomosis and in one patient as a permanent faecal diversion for colonic atony. Six emergency loop ileostomies were performed; in four patients after colonic perforations and in two patients as a primary treatment secondary to colonic anastomotic leakage. Peri-operatively, none of the patients with an elective operation died. Four patients with an emergency operation, however, all died of irreversible peritoneal sepsis. Complications were a diversion colitis and an abdominal sepsis after anastomotic leakage in a second patient who required a re-operation. During follow-up (up to four years) one patient suffered from an episode of severe dehydration six months after operation. The ileal continuity was, without mortality, restored in 23 patients. Two patients had a wound infection with, in one of them, a late cicatricial hernia. In our experience, a defunctioning loop ileostomy is a relatively safe procedure and is, in our opinion, preferable to loop colostomy for temporary faecal diversion. The high mortality following emergency loop ileostomy reflects the bad prognosis of these patients and indicates the need for resection of the primary disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":77640,"journal":{"name":"The Netherlands journal of surgery","volume":"43 5","pages":"192-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Netherlands journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirty patients underwent a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Elective ileostomy was performed in 23 patients to protect a potentially vulnerable colorectal anastomosis and in one patient as a permanent faecal diversion for colonic atony. Six emergency loop ileostomies were performed; in four patients after colonic perforations and in two patients as a primary treatment secondary to colonic anastomotic leakage. Peri-operatively, none of the patients with an elective operation died. Four patients with an emergency operation, however, all died of irreversible peritoneal sepsis. Complications were a diversion colitis and an abdominal sepsis after anastomotic leakage in a second patient who required a re-operation. During follow-up (up to four years) one patient suffered from an episode of severe dehydration six months after operation. The ileal continuity was, without mortality, restored in 23 patients. Two patients had a wound infection with, in one of them, a late cicatricial hernia. In our experience, a defunctioning loop ileostomy is a relatively safe procedure and is, in our opinion, preferable to loop colostomy for temporary faecal diversion. The high mortality following emergency loop ileostomy reflects the bad prognosis of these patients and indicates the need for resection of the primary disease.

回肠袢造口术在结直肠手术中的未来作用?
30例患者接受了功能性回肠袢造口术。23例患者进行了选择性回肠造口术,以保护潜在的易受伤害的结肠吻合术,1例患者作为结肠张力的永久粪便转移。6例急诊回肠袢造口术;4例患者在结肠穿孔后和2例患者作为结肠吻合口渗漏继发的主要治疗。围手术期,择期手术患者无一例死亡。然而,四名接受紧急手术的患者都死于不可逆的腹膜败血症。并发症是转移性结肠炎和腹部败血症后,吻合口漏的第二个病人需要再次手术。在随访期间(长达4年),1例患者术后6个月出现严重脱水。23例患者恢复回肠连续性,无死亡。两名患者有伤口感染,其中一人有晚期瘢痕疝。根据我们的经验,失功能回肠袢造口术是一种相对安全的手术,我们认为,为了暂时的粪便转移,袢造口术比袢造口术更可取。急诊回肠袢造口术后的高死亡率反映了这些患者预后不良,并提示需要切除原发疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信