Insects, Age, and Failure: The Suppressed Chapter of "The Wasp in a Wig"

Laura A. White
{"title":"Insects, Age, and Failure: The Suppressed Chapter of \"The Wasp in a Wig\"","authors":"Laura A. White","doi":"10.5325/dickstudannu.54.1.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Why did Lewis Carroll decide to suppress \"The Wasp in a Wig\" from Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There (1871)? Certainly, he was acting on the advice of John Tenniel. However, the chapter's suppression was likely not just because a wasp in a wig is hard to draw but because Carroll determined that the chapter was weaker in literary value than the rest of Looking-Glass. This article will argue that the weakness of the chapter follows from Carroll's lifelong habit of digging at ideological sore points (in this case, how insects should be understood within a Christian as opposed to Darwinian view), conjoined with his growing anxieties about aging. These two themes work in tandem inadvertently to reach beyond the pleasures of nonsense to fall into genuine pathos; the human wasp, far more anthropomorphized than the looking-glass insects, is indeed both a social failure and close to death. Perhaps even a child reader cannot be much consoled by Alice's reflection when she leaves the wasp that she was \"quite pleased that she had gone back and given a few minutes to making the poor old creature comfortable\" (AA 298).","PeriodicalId":195639,"journal":{"name":"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.54.1.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Why did Lewis Carroll decide to suppress "The Wasp in a Wig" from Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There (1871)? Certainly, he was acting on the advice of John Tenniel. However, the chapter's suppression was likely not just because a wasp in a wig is hard to draw but because Carroll determined that the chapter was weaker in literary value than the rest of Looking-Glass. This article will argue that the weakness of the chapter follows from Carroll's lifelong habit of digging at ideological sore points (in this case, how insects should be understood within a Christian as opposed to Darwinian view), conjoined with his growing anxieties about aging. These two themes work in tandem inadvertently to reach beyond the pleasures of nonsense to fall into genuine pathos; the human wasp, far more anthropomorphized than the looking-glass insects, is indeed both a social failure and close to death. Perhaps even a child reader cannot be much consoled by Alice's reflection when she leaves the wasp that she was "quite pleased that she had gone back and given a few minutes to making the poor old creature comfortable" (AA 298).
昆虫、年龄和失败:《戴假发的黄蜂》中被压抑的一章
为什么刘易斯·卡罗尔决定取缔《爱丽丝镜中奇遇记》(1871)中的“戴假发的黄蜂”?当然,他是按照约翰·坦尼尔的建议行事的。然而,这一章的压制可能不仅仅是因为戴假发的黄蜂很难画,而是因为卡罗尔认为这一章的文学价值比《镜中之镜》的其他章节要弱。这篇文章认为,这一章的不足之处源于卡罗尔一生都喜欢挖掘意识形态上的痛点(在这种情况下,从基督教的角度来理解昆虫,而不是从达尔文的角度来理解昆虫),以及他对衰老的日益焦虑。这两个主题不经意间相互作用,超越了无聊的乐趣,陷入了真正的悲情;人类黄蜂,远比镜子里的昆虫更人格化,确实是一个社会失败和接近死亡。当爱丽丝离开黄蜂时,她“很高兴自己回去了,花了几分钟时间让这个可怜的老家伙感到舒服”(AA 298),也许即使是一个小读者也不能从爱丽丝的反思中得到多少安慰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信