Some Considerations about the Value Based Pricing in Oncology: An Analysis on Metastatic First Line Medicinal Products

F. Spandonaro, D. Giannarelli, B. Polistena
{"title":"Some Considerations about the Value Based Pricing in Oncology: An Analysis on Metastatic First Line Medicinal Products","authors":"F. Spandonaro, D. Giannarelli, B. Polistena","doi":"10.5301/GRHTA.5000218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some considerations about the value based pricing in oncology: an analysis on metastatic first line medicinal products. Introduction: In recent years public health systems have faced the challenge of ensuring sustainable costs for inno-vative medicinal products. The aim of this study is to analyse pricing behaviour applied in the Italian oncology sector. Methods: The study examined all new oncologic compounds that are reimbursed in Italy, for utilization in the first-line metastatic setting. A regression model was developed to analyse the relation between drug price, clini-cal benefit, market potential and the year in which reimbursement was granted in Italy. The clinical benefit was measured by increment in Overall Survival respect to standard of care; two different metrics were considered, namely median and mean. \nResults: The analysis revealed a strong correlation between price and clinical benefit and a weak negative correla-tion between prices and volumes; no time trends were observed in reimbursement price reduction. As regards pricing, the Italian Medicines Agency seems to have maintained basically consistent reference levels over the 10 years. Nevertheless, the analysis highlighted significant differences: some compounds showed lower prices than expected; conversely, vemurafenib, sunitinib and, to a much lesser degree, pazopanib prices were higher than expected. The only drug for which price evaluation is inverted depending on whether median or mean val-ues are used is ipilimumab, the only immunotherapeutic compound considered. \nDiscussion: The study highlights the extent to which the value of oncological drugs depends on the endpoints considered in the analysis, as well as on the metric adopted, , confirming that the decision must be multidimen-sional, as required by an Health Technology Assessment rationale.","PeriodicalId":228031,"journal":{"name":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/GRHTA.5000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Some considerations about the value based pricing in oncology: an analysis on metastatic first line medicinal products. Introduction: In recent years public health systems have faced the challenge of ensuring sustainable costs for inno-vative medicinal products. The aim of this study is to analyse pricing behaviour applied in the Italian oncology sector. Methods: The study examined all new oncologic compounds that are reimbursed in Italy, for utilization in the first-line metastatic setting. A regression model was developed to analyse the relation between drug price, clini-cal benefit, market potential and the year in which reimbursement was granted in Italy. The clinical benefit was measured by increment in Overall Survival respect to standard of care; two different metrics were considered, namely median and mean. Results: The analysis revealed a strong correlation between price and clinical benefit and a weak negative correla-tion between prices and volumes; no time trends were observed in reimbursement price reduction. As regards pricing, the Italian Medicines Agency seems to have maintained basically consistent reference levels over the 10 years. Nevertheless, the analysis highlighted significant differences: some compounds showed lower prices than expected; conversely, vemurafenib, sunitinib and, to a much lesser degree, pazopanib prices were higher than expected. The only drug for which price evaluation is inverted depending on whether median or mean val-ues are used is ipilimumab, the only immunotherapeutic compound considered. Discussion: The study highlights the extent to which the value of oncological drugs depends on the endpoints considered in the analysis, as well as on the metric adopted, , confirming that the decision must be multidimen-sional, as required by an Health Technology Assessment rationale.
肿瘤学基于价值定价的若干思考:对转移性一线药物的分析
肿瘤学中基于价值定价的若干考虑:对转移性一线药物的分析。近年来,公共卫生系统面临着确保创新药品可持续成本的挑战。本研究的目的是分析定价行为适用于意大利肿瘤部门。方法:该研究检查了在意大利报销的所有新的肿瘤化合物,用于一线转移设置。开发了一个回归模型来分析药品价格、临床效益、市场潜力和在意大利获得报销的年份之间的关系。临床获益是通过相对于标准护理的总生存期的增加来衡量的;考虑了两个不同的指标,即中位数和平均值。结果:价格与临床获益呈强相关关系,与量呈弱负相关关系;在报销价格降低方面没有观察到时间趋势。关于定价,意大利药品管理局似乎在过去10年中基本保持了一致的参考水平。然而,分析强调了显著的差异:一些化合物的价格低于预期;相反,vemurafenib、舒尼替尼(sunitinib)和帕唑帕尼(pazopanib)的价格高于预期,但程度要小得多。唯一的价格评估取决于使用中位数还是平均值的药物是ipilimumab,这是唯一考虑的免疫治疗化合物。讨论:该研究强调了肿瘤药物的价值在多大程度上取决于分析中考虑的终点,以及所采用的度量标准,证实了决策必须是多维的,这是卫生技术评估基本原理所要求的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信