Does Distance Still Matter For Internal Migration And, If So, How? Evidence From 1986 To 2006

Omoniyi B. Alimi, Davide Mare, J. Poot
{"title":"Does Distance Still Matter For Internal Migration And, If So, How? Evidence From 1986 To 2006","authors":"Omoniyi B. Alimi, Davide Mare, J. Poot","doi":"10.26686/LEW.V0I0.3897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we re-examine the structure of internal migration flows in New Zealand.  We use data on gross migration flows between the 39 main and secondary urban areas for the four intercensal periods between 1986 and 2006.  We confirm that the gravity model – in which migration is inversely related to distance – fits the data well, and that the way in which distance is measured (travel time, road distance or straight-line distance) matters to some extent for the goodness of fit of the model. We also show that some forms of socioeconomic differences influence migration in the same way as distance. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the deterrence effect of distance on migration was increasing, at least until 2001. Improvements in connectivity through reduced travel time have not increased migration flows.","PeriodicalId":130683,"journal":{"name":"Labour, Employment and Work in New Zealand","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour, Employment and Work in New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/LEW.V0I0.3897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper we re-examine the structure of internal migration flows in New Zealand.  We use data on gross migration flows between the 39 main and secondary urban areas for the four intercensal periods between 1986 and 2006.  We confirm that the gravity model – in which migration is inversely related to distance – fits the data well, and that the way in which distance is measured (travel time, road distance or straight-line distance) matters to some extent for the goodness of fit of the model. We also show that some forms of socioeconomic differences influence migration in the same way as distance. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the deterrence effect of distance on migration was increasing, at least until 2001. Improvements in connectivity through reduced travel time have not increased migration flows.
距离对国内移民仍然有影响吗?如果有,是如何影响的?证据从1986年到2006年
在本文中,我们重新审视了新西兰内部移民流动的结构。我们使用了1986年至2006年四个人口普查期间39个主要和次要城市地区之间的总移民流动数据。我们确认重力模型-其中迁移与距离成反比-很好地拟合数据,并且测量距离的方式(旅行时间,道路距离或直线距离)在一定程度上影响模型的拟合度。我们还表明,某些形式的社会经济差异以与距离相同的方式影响移民。也许令人惊讶的是,我们发现距离对移民的威慑作用正在增强,至少在2001年之前是这样。通过缩短旅行时间来改善连通性并没有增加移民流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信