Antibiofilm Activities of Fluoride Releasing Restorative Materials

Mehmet Tartici, Tuğçe Tartici, Başar Karaca, Gürkan Gür
{"title":"Antibiofilm Activities of Fluoride Releasing Restorative Materials","authors":"Mehmet Tartici, Tuğçe Tartici, Başar Karaca, Gürkan Gür","doi":"10.2478/bjdm-2020-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Backround/Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study is to evaluate the antibiofilm and antimicrobial activities of 5 different restorative materials that release fluoride. Material and Methods: Five different fluoride releasing restorative materials [Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia), Riva Light Cure (SDI, Australia), Riva Silver (SDI, Australia), Dyract® XP (DENTSPLY, Germany) and Beautifil II (SHOFU, Japan)] and one composite resin material (Grandio, VOCO, Germany) were selected for this study. A total of 48 specimens (8 of each) were prepared using Teflon molds (4.0 mm-diameter and 2.0 mm-thickness). The antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of the mentioned restorative materials on Streptococcus mutans were evaluated. The data obtained were evaluated by One-Way analysis and Tukey’s Test (p<0.05). Results: As a result, no correlation was found in terms of antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of the restorative materials evaluated in the study. While the dental plaque (matrix) accumulation was detected at least on the Grandio resin, the materials with the least cell adhesion were Light Cure and Riva Self Cure since it showed antiadhesive properties for S. mutans. Conclusions: Although the highest antibacterial activity against S. mutans was detected in resin-modified glass ionomers, biofilm matrix (dental plaque) accumulation was mostly detected on these material surface in our study.","PeriodicalId":161469,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjdm-2020-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary Backround/Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study is to evaluate the antibiofilm and antimicrobial activities of 5 different restorative materials that release fluoride. Material and Methods: Five different fluoride releasing restorative materials [Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia), Riva Light Cure (SDI, Australia), Riva Silver (SDI, Australia), Dyract® XP (DENTSPLY, Germany) and Beautifil II (SHOFU, Japan)] and one composite resin material (Grandio, VOCO, Germany) were selected for this study. A total of 48 specimens (8 of each) were prepared using Teflon molds (4.0 mm-diameter and 2.0 mm-thickness). The antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of the mentioned restorative materials on Streptococcus mutans were evaluated. The data obtained were evaluated by One-Way analysis and Tukey’s Test (p<0.05). Results: As a result, no correlation was found in terms of antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of the restorative materials evaluated in the study. While the dental plaque (matrix) accumulation was detected at least on the Grandio resin, the materials with the least cell adhesion were Light Cure and Riva Self Cure since it showed antiadhesive properties for S. mutans. Conclusions: Although the highest antibacterial activity against S. mutans was detected in resin-modified glass ionomers, biofilm matrix (dental plaque) accumulation was mostly detected on these material surface in our study.
释氟修复材料的抗菌膜活性研究
背景/目的:对5种不同的释氟修复材料的抗菌膜及抑菌活性进行体外研究。材料和方法:本研究选择了五种不同的氟化物释放修复材料[Riva Self Cure (SDI,澳大利亚),Riva Light Cure (SDI,澳大利亚),Riva Silver (SDI,澳大利亚),Dyract®XP (DENTSPLY,德国)和Beautifil II (SHOFU,日本)]和一种复合树脂材料(Grandio, VOCO,德国)。采用直径4.0 mm、厚度2.0 mm的Teflon模具共制备48个标本(各8个)。评价了上述修复材料对变形链球菌的抑菌活性和抗生物膜活性。所得资料采用单因素分析和Tukey检验(p<0.05)进行评价。结果:本研究评价的修复材料的抗菌和抗生物膜活性之间没有相关性。而Grandio树脂上最少检测到牙菌斑(基质)积累,细胞粘附最少的材料是Light Cure和Riva Self Cure,因为它对变形链球菌具有抗粘附性能。结论:虽然树脂修饰的玻璃离聚体对变形链球菌的抗菌活性最高,但在我们的研究中,这些材料表面主要检测到生物膜基质(牙菌斑)的积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信