{"title":"Experimental Comparison of Synchronous Reluctance Motors with and without Ferrite Magnet Assistance","authors":"S. Neusüs, A. Binder","doi":"10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both, the synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) and the permanent magnet assisted synchronous reluctance motor (PMaSynRM), are high-efficient inverter-fed motors in variable-speed drive applications. Here, both machines are designed for the same stator of an 11 kW totally-enclosed, fan-cooled standard cage induction motor. The experimental comparison between both motors confirms that the PMaSynRM using ferrite magnets has a 20% higher nominal output torque for the same rated current, an increased power factor of 0.88 instead of 0.81 and a higher efficiency by 1.2%-points in the base speed range at 1500 rpm as well as a 27% higher steady-state output power in the field-weakening range at 3000 rpm. On the contrary, the performance of the PMaSynRM decreases with increasing ferrite magnet temperature. Further, the ferrite magnets demagnetize partially at a three-phase sudden short-circuit.","PeriodicalId":378634,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Both, the synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) and the permanent magnet assisted synchronous reluctance motor (PMaSynRM), are high-efficient inverter-fed motors in variable-speed drive applications. Here, both machines are designed for the same stator of an 11 kW totally-enclosed, fan-cooled standard cage induction motor. The experimental comparison between both motors confirms that the PMaSynRM using ferrite magnets has a 20% higher nominal output torque for the same rated current, an increased power factor of 0.88 instead of 0.81 and a higher efficiency by 1.2%-points in the base speed range at 1500 rpm as well as a 27% higher steady-state output power in the field-weakening range at 3000 rpm. On the contrary, the performance of the PMaSynRM decreases with increasing ferrite magnet temperature. Further, the ferrite magnets demagnetize partially at a three-phase sudden short-circuit.