Perbandingan Sampling dengan Metode Test Pit dan Pengeboran pada Endapan Bauksit PT. Prima Abadi Mineral Kabupaten Ketapang Provinsi Kalimantan Barat

I. Afandi
{"title":"Perbandingan Sampling dengan Metode Test Pit dan Pengeboran pada Endapan Bauksit PT. Prima Abadi Mineral Kabupaten Ketapang Provinsi Kalimantan Barat","authors":"I. Afandi","doi":"10.31959/JS.V9I1.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resource estimation are related to the quality of samples in the field. One of sampling bauxite method is a test pit. However, sufficiently deep deposition conditions become a constraint related to security in retrieval by this method. Therefore, researchers suspect that bauxite sampling can also be done by drilling with results that are not much different from making test pits. the aim of this study was to compare bauxite sampling with with test pits and drilling seen from the engineering work, cost efficiency, time and quality of the sampling produced. The research was conducted at PT. Harita Prima Abadi Mineral Ketapang by observing the sampling process and interviewing workers. It was obtained that the cost of making 1 (one) test pit was Rp. 5.000.000, and the cost of 1 (one) drilling is Rp. 2.000.000. The time fore making a test pit to minimal 3 workers is 6-8 hours and the drilling time to minimal 4 workers is 3-4 hours. The quality of bauxite samples from test pit is very good, the umber of samples can be taken as needed. While the quality of drilling samples is CF cannot be calkulated and bauxite samples obtained have a small size and a little amount.","PeriodicalId":236437,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL SIMETRIK","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL SIMETRIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31959/JS.V9I1.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resource estimation are related to the quality of samples in the field. One of sampling bauxite method is a test pit. However, sufficiently deep deposition conditions become a constraint related to security in retrieval by this method. Therefore, researchers suspect that bauxite sampling can also be done by drilling with results that are not much different from making test pits. the aim of this study was to compare bauxite sampling with with test pits and drilling seen from the engineering work, cost efficiency, time and quality of the sampling produced. The research was conducted at PT. Harita Prima Abadi Mineral Ketapang by observing the sampling process and interviewing workers. It was obtained that the cost of making 1 (one) test pit was Rp. 5.000.000, and the cost of 1 (one) drilling is Rp. 2.000.000. The time fore making a test pit to minimal 3 workers is 6-8 hours and the drilling time to minimal 4 workers is 3-4 hours. The quality of bauxite samples from test pit is very good, the umber of samples can be taken as needed. While the quality of drilling samples is CF cannot be calkulated and bauxite samples obtained have a small size and a little amount.
资源估计与现场样品的质量有关。铝土矿取样方法之一是试坑法。然而,足够深的沉积条件成为该方法检索安全性的制约因素。因此,研究人员怀疑铝土矿取样也可以通过钻孔来完成,其结果与制造测试坑没有太大的不同。本研究的目的是从工程工作、成本效益、时间和取样质量等方面比较铝土矿取样与试验坑和钻孔。研究是在PT. Harita Prima Abadi Mineral Ketapang通过观察取样过程和采访工人进行的。计算结果表明,造1(1)个试验坑的成本为5.00万卢比,钻1(1)个试验坑的成本为2.00万卢比。最少3名工人的试坑制作时间为6-8小时,最少4名工人的钻井时间为3-4小时。试验矿坑铝土矿样品质量很好,样品数量可根据需要选择。而钻孔样品的质量CF无法计算,获得的铝土矿样品尺寸小,数量少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信