Dictionaries and Decision Trees for the 2019 CLPsych Shared Task

Micah Iserman, Taleen Nalabandian, Molly Ireland
{"title":"Dictionaries and Decision Trees for the 2019 CLPsych Shared Task","authors":"Micah Iserman, Taleen Nalabandian, Molly Ireland","doi":"10.18653/v1/W19-3025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this summary, we discuss our approach to the CLPsych Shared Task and its initial results. For our predictions in each task, we used a recursive partitioning algorithm (decision trees) to select from our set of features, which were primarily dictionary scores and counts of individual words. We focused primarily on Task A, which aimed to predict suicide risk, as rated by a team of expert clinicians (Shing et al., 2018), based on language used in SuicideWatch posts on Reddit. Category-level findings highlight the potential importance of social and moral language categories. Word-level correlates of risk levels underline the value of fine-grained data-driven approaches, revealing both theory-consistent and potentially novel correlates of suicide risk that may motivate future research.","PeriodicalId":201097,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-3025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this summary, we discuss our approach to the CLPsych Shared Task and its initial results. For our predictions in each task, we used a recursive partitioning algorithm (decision trees) to select from our set of features, which were primarily dictionary scores and counts of individual words. We focused primarily on Task A, which aimed to predict suicide risk, as rated by a team of expert clinicians (Shing et al., 2018), based on language used in SuicideWatch posts on Reddit. Category-level findings highlight the potential importance of social and moral language categories. Word-level correlates of risk levels underline the value of fine-grained data-driven approaches, revealing both theory-consistent and potentially novel correlates of suicide risk that may motivate future research.
2019年CLPsych共享任务的字典和决策树
在这个总结中,我们讨论了CLPsych共享任务的方法及其初步结果。对于我们在每个任务中的预测,我们使用递归划分算法(决策树)从我们的特征集中进行选择,这些特征集主要是字典分数和单个单词的计数。我们主要关注任务A,该任务旨在预测自杀风险,由专家临床医生团队(Shing et al., 2018)根据Reddit上SuicideWatch帖子中使用的语言进行评估。类别层面的研究结果强调了社会和道德语言类别的潜在重要性。单词级别的风险水平相关性强调了细粒度数据驱动方法的价值,揭示了理论一致的和潜在的新颖的自杀风险相关性,这可能会激发未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信