A Conspiracy of Paper? William Paterson and the Mysterious Origins of Banking and Company Law

J. Farrar
{"title":"A Conspiracy of Paper? William Paterson and the Mysterious Origins of Banking and Company Law","authors":"J. Farrar","doi":"10.53300/001c.17401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the creation of the Bank of England and other contemporary banks, the Scottish Darien Scheme and the South Sea Bubble. It considers the role of William Paterson, a progressive Scottish merchant and economist, in all of these and the negotiations over the Act of Union of England and Scotland. The article reflects on the use of legislation and royal charters, together with the idea of joint stock and negotiability. It seeks to untangle the complex relationships of the Darien Company and the South Sea Company to banking operations of the time. Although Paterson had a minor role in the South Sea company, it was based on some of his ideas but he opposed the ultimate scheme to take over the national debt in exchange for stock which followed the policies of his compatriot John Law for France. Law in his turn had been influenced by the Bank of England and the Darien Scheme fund raising. The Bubble Act 1720, responding to the panic caused by collapse of bubble companies, was passed a year after his death and impeded the development of company and banking law for over a century. \n\nWhat this history demonstrates is the difficulty in benefitting from innovation. How the idea of projection or promotion began as something which was thought of in dubious terms. Vested interests were keen to exploit innovation after they initially fought hard to resist it. Then speculative mania took over. The history also reflects a surprisingly high fiduciary duty on a director based on guild ideas before the modern concept developed. Notwithstanding this conflict of interest was practised by influential people often with impunity until it became a political issue when the results were draconian but not necessarily consistent in the absence of modern winding up laws and insolvent trading. A similar picture is illustrated by the experience of John Law in France with the Banque Royale and the Mississippi Company. Their writings represent some of the earliest theorising on economics, banking and international trade more than fifty years before Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. It was not simply a conspiracy of paper","PeriodicalId":165934,"journal":{"name":"The Bond Law Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bond Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.17401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the creation of the Bank of England and other contemporary banks, the Scottish Darien Scheme and the South Sea Bubble. It considers the role of William Paterson, a progressive Scottish merchant and economist, in all of these and the negotiations over the Act of Union of England and Scotland. The article reflects on the use of legislation and royal charters, together with the idea of joint stock and negotiability. It seeks to untangle the complex relationships of the Darien Company and the South Sea Company to banking operations of the time. Although Paterson had a minor role in the South Sea company, it was based on some of his ideas but he opposed the ultimate scheme to take over the national debt in exchange for stock which followed the policies of his compatriot John Law for France. Law in his turn had been influenced by the Bank of England and the Darien Scheme fund raising. The Bubble Act 1720, responding to the panic caused by collapse of bubble companies, was passed a year after his death and impeded the development of company and banking law for over a century. What this history demonstrates is the difficulty in benefitting from innovation. How the idea of projection or promotion began as something which was thought of in dubious terms. Vested interests were keen to exploit innovation after they initially fought hard to resist it. Then speculative mania took over. The history also reflects a surprisingly high fiduciary duty on a director based on guild ideas before the modern concept developed. Notwithstanding this conflict of interest was practised by influential people often with impunity until it became a political issue when the results were draconian but not necessarily consistent in the absence of modern winding up laws and insolvent trading. A similar picture is illustrated by the experience of John Law in France with the Banque Royale and the Mississippi Company. Their writings represent some of the earliest theorising on economics, banking and international trade more than fifty years before Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. It was not simply a conspiracy of paper
纸上的阴谋?威廉·帕特森与银行法和公司法的神秘起源
本文考察了英格兰银行和其他当代银行的创建、苏格兰达里恩计划和南海泡沫。它考虑了进步的苏格兰商人和经济学家威廉·帕特森(William Paterson)在所有这些以及英格兰和苏格兰联合法案(Act of Union)谈判中的作用。本文对立法和皇家特许的运用进行了反思,并结合了股份制和流通性的思想。它试图理清达连公司和南海公司与当时银行业务之间的复杂关系。尽管帕特森在南海公司扮演了一个小角色,但这是基于他的一些想法,但他反对接管国债以换取股票的最终计划,这遵循了他的同胞约翰·劳在法国的政策。而劳则受到了英格兰银行和达里恩计划筹资的影响。1720年的《泡沫法案》(Bubble Act 1720)是为了应对泡沫公司倒闭引发的恐慌,在他去世一年后通过的,它阻碍了公司法和银行法的发展长达一个多世纪。这段历史表明,从创新中获益是困难的。投射或提升的概念是如何开始被认为是可疑的。既得利益集团在最初极力抵制创新之后,热衷于利用创新。然后,投机狂热取而代之。这段历史也反映了在现代概念发展之前,基于行会思想的董事负有令人惊讶的高度受托责任。尽管如此,有影响力的人经常不受惩罚地实施这种利益冲突,直到它成为一个政治问题,其结果是严厉的,但在缺乏现代清盘法和破产贸易的情况下不一定是一致的。约翰·劳在法国的皇家银行和密西西比公司的经历也说明了类似的情况。他们的著作代表了最早的经济学、银行业和国际贸易理论,比亚当•斯密的《国富论》早了50多年。这不仅仅是纸上的阴谋
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信