Characterising Faults in Aspect-Oriented Programs: Towards Filling the Gap Between Theory and Practice

F. Ferrari, Rachel Burrows, Otávio Augusto Lazzarini Lemos, Alessandro F. Garcia, J. Maldonado
{"title":"Characterising Faults in Aspect-Oriented Programs: Towards Filling the Gap Between Theory and Practice","authors":"F. Ferrari, Rachel Burrows, Otávio Augusto Lazzarini Lemos, Alessandro F. Garcia, J. Maldonado","doi":"10.1109/SBES.2010.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the proposal of Aspect-Oriented Programming, several candidate fault taxonomies for aspect-oriented (AO) software have been proposed. Such taxonomies, however, generally rely on language features, hence still requiring practical evaluation based on realistic implementation scenarios. The current lack of available AO systems for evaluation as well as historical data are the two major obstacles for this kind of study. This paper quantifies, documents and classifies faults uncovered in several releases of three AO systems, all from different application domains. Our empirical analysis naturally led us to revisit and refine a previously defined fault taxonomy. We identified particular fault types that stood out amongst the categories defined in the taxonomy. Besides this, we illustrate recurring faulty scenarios extracted from the analysed systems. We believe such scenarios should be considered for the establishment of testing strategies along the software development process.","PeriodicalId":306692,"journal":{"name":"2010 Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2010.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Since the proposal of Aspect-Oriented Programming, several candidate fault taxonomies for aspect-oriented (AO) software have been proposed. Such taxonomies, however, generally rely on language features, hence still requiring practical evaluation based on realistic implementation scenarios. The current lack of available AO systems for evaluation as well as historical data are the two major obstacles for this kind of study. This paper quantifies, documents and classifies faults uncovered in several releases of three AO systems, all from different application domains. Our empirical analysis naturally led us to revisit and refine a previously defined fault taxonomy. We identified particular fault types that stood out amongst the categories defined in the taxonomy. Besides this, we illustrate recurring faulty scenarios extracted from the analysed systems. We believe such scenarios should be considered for the establishment of testing strategies along the software development process.
面向方面程序中的缺陷特征:填补理论与实践之间的差距
自面向方面编程提出以来,已经提出了几种面向方面软件的候选故障分类法。然而,这种分类法通常依赖于语言特性,因此仍然需要基于实际实现场景进行实际评估。目前缺乏可用于评价的AO系统以及历史数据是这类研究的两个主要障碍。本文对来自不同应用领域的三个AO系统的几个版本中发现的故障进行了量化、文档化和分类。我们的经验分析很自然地使我们重新审视和改进先前定义的故障分类。我们确定了在分类法中定义的类别中突出的特定故障类型。除此之外,我们还说明了从分析系统中提取的重复故障场景。我们认为在软件开发过程中,应该考虑这样的场景来建立测试策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信