The Legal Politics of Regulating Indigenous Peoples

Kenneth Adriel, Tania Winata, R. Rossellini, Jeane Neltje
{"title":"The Legal Politics of Regulating Indigenous Peoples","authors":"Kenneth Adriel, Tania Winata, R. Rossellini, Jeane Neltje","doi":"10.55849/rjl.v1i1.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. This research raises the issue of the existence of customary law communities in Indonesia, as well as the dynamics of customary law communities seen from the decision of the Constitutional Court.\nPurpose. This research is focused on analyzing two things, namely: First, what is the existence of indigenous peoples in Indonesia? Second, how is the legal politics of indigenous peoples through the decision of the Constitutional Court? This research uses a statute approach.\nMethod. his research uses a statute approach. In addition, a case approach is also used to find out the ratio decidendi used by the Constitutional Court judges in deciding cases of judicial review of laws related to indigenous peoples.\nResults. The results of the study concluded: first, the existence of indigenous peoples in Indonesia has been accommodated in various spheres of legislation, both in the 1945 Constitution, Laws, Regional Regulations, Governor Decrees, and Regent Decrees. Second, the legal politics of indigenous peoples through the decision of the Constitutional Court strengthens the existence of indigenous peoples in Indonesia by providing various interpretations or explanations.\nConclusion. this study are that the Panel of Judges in cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse should minimize criminal disparities to prevent the development of a negative perspective of society towards the criminal system in judicial institutions.\n ","PeriodicalId":349644,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law","volume":"04 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55849/rjl.v1i1.319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. This research raises the issue of the existence of customary law communities in Indonesia, as well as the dynamics of customary law communities seen from the decision of the Constitutional Court. Purpose. This research is focused on analyzing two things, namely: First, what is the existence of indigenous peoples in Indonesia? Second, how is the legal politics of indigenous peoples through the decision of the Constitutional Court? This research uses a statute approach. Method. his research uses a statute approach. In addition, a case approach is also used to find out the ratio decidendi used by the Constitutional Court judges in deciding cases of judicial review of laws related to indigenous peoples. Results. The results of the study concluded: first, the existence of indigenous peoples in Indonesia has been accommodated in various spheres of legislation, both in the 1945 Constitution, Laws, Regional Regulations, Governor Decrees, and Regent Decrees. Second, the legal politics of indigenous peoples through the decision of the Constitutional Court strengthens the existence of indigenous peoples in Indonesia by providing various interpretations or explanations. Conclusion. this study are that the Panel of Judges in cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse should minimize criminal disparities to prevent the development of a negative perspective of society towards the criminal system in judicial institutions.  
规范原住民族的法律政治
背景。本研究提出印尼习惯法社群是否存在的问题,以及从宪法法院的判决来看,习惯法社群的动态。本研究主要分析两件事,即:第一,印尼土著民族的存在是什么?第二,透过宪法法院的判决,原住民族的法律政治如何?本研究采用成文法研究方法。他的研究采用了法规的方法。此外,还采用案例方法来查明宪法法院法官在裁决与土著人民有关的法律的司法审查案件时使用的判决比例。研究的结论是:第一,印度尼西亚土著人民的存在在各个立法领域得到照顾,包括1945年《宪法》、法律、区域条例、总督法令和摄政法令。第二,通过宪法法院的裁决,原住民的法律政治通过提供各种解释或解释,加强了印尼原住民的存在。这项研究的目的是,在滥用麻醉品的犯罪行为案件中,法官小组应尽量减少刑事差异,以防止社会对司法机构的刑事制度产生消极的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信