Assessment of prognostic factors for differential diagnostics between mono- and mixed infection of the febrile form of tick-borne encephalitis

E. Ilyinskikh, E. Filatova, A. V. Semenova, Yu. I. Bulankov, V. N. Nekrasov, Yu. V. Minakova, S. Axyonov, O. Voronkova, K. Samoylov, N. S. Buzhak
{"title":"Assessment of prognostic factors for differential diagnostics between mono- and mixed infection of the febrile form of tick-borne encephalitis","authors":"E. Ilyinskikh, E. Filatova, A. V. Semenova, Yu. I. Bulankov, V. N. Nekrasov, Yu. V. Minakova, S. Axyonov, O. Voronkova, K. Samoylov, N. S. Buzhak","doi":"10.22625/2072-6732-2023-15-2-74-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: is to assess clinical and laboratory prognostic factors to develop a differential diagnostic model between the monoinfection of tick-borne encephalitis febrile form and the mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis with Lyme borreliosis non-erythemal form at the onset of the disease.Materials and methods. The clinical examination involving 56 patients with tick-borne encephalitis febrile form (mean age: 46.1±3.1 years) and 27 patients with the mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis with Lyme borreliosis non-erythemal form (mean age: 47.2±3.2 years) has resulted in the assessment of 65 clinical and laboratory parameters in the first week of the disease including 14 indicators of standard and extended hemogram profiles and 6 blood leukocyte indices. Pearson’s goodness-of-fit test was used for statistical analysis. The predictive values of the parameters were determined by the odds ratio and ROC analysis with AUC. The logistic regression model was developed using STATISTICA 12.0.Results. To make differential diagnosis between mono- and mixed infection at the onset of the disease the following hematological parameters with “average” or “good” predictive values can be used: band neutrophil count (AUC=0.65), the index of leukocytes and erythrocyte sedimentation rate ratio (AUC=0.66), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (AUC=0.70), neutrophil granularity intensity (AUC=0.66), neutrophil reactivity intensity (AUC=0.72) and reactive lymphocytes count (AUC= 0.72). A logistic regression model with a “very good” predictive value (AUC=0.83) is developed which includes the following four predictors: band neutrophil count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NEUT-RI and NEUT-GI in peripheral blood.Conclusion. The model is allowed to make a differential diagnosis between the mono- and the mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis with good sensitivity and specificity values in the first week of disease.","PeriodicalId":226950,"journal":{"name":"Journal Infectology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Infectology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2023-15-2-74-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: is to assess clinical and laboratory prognostic factors to develop a differential diagnostic model between the monoinfection of tick-borne encephalitis febrile form and the mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis with Lyme borreliosis non-erythemal form at the onset of the disease.Materials and methods. The clinical examination involving 56 patients with tick-borne encephalitis febrile form (mean age: 46.1±3.1 years) and 27 patients with the mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis with Lyme borreliosis non-erythemal form (mean age: 47.2±3.2 years) has resulted in the assessment of 65 clinical and laboratory parameters in the first week of the disease including 14 indicators of standard and extended hemogram profiles and 6 blood leukocyte indices. Pearson’s goodness-of-fit test was used for statistical analysis. The predictive values of the parameters were determined by the odds ratio and ROC analysis with AUC. The logistic regression model was developed using STATISTICA 12.0.Results. To make differential diagnosis between mono- and mixed infection at the onset of the disease the following hematological parameters with “average” or “good” predictive values can be used: band neutrophil count (AUC=0.65), the index of leukocytes and erythrocyte sedimentation rate ratio (AUC=0.66), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (AUC=0.70), neutrophil granularity intensity (AUC=0.66), neutrophil reactivity intensity (AUC=0.72) and reactive lymphocytes count (AUC= 0.72). A logistic regression model with a “very good” predictive value (AUC=0.83) is developed which includes the following four predictors: band neutrophil count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NEUT-RI and NEUT-GI in peripheral blood.Conclusion. The model is allowed to make a differential diagnosis between the mono- and the mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis with good sensitivity and specificity values in the first week of disease.
热型蜱传脑炎单一感染和混合感染鉴别诊断预后因素的评估
目的:评估临床和实验室预后因素,建立一种蜱传脑炎发热型单一感染和蜱传脑炎伴莱姆病非红斑型混合感染的鉴别诊断模型。材料和方法。对56例发热型蜱传脑炎患者(平均年龄46.1±3.1岁)和27例蜱传脑炎与非红斑型莱姆病borreliosis混合感染患者(平均年龄47.2±3.2岁)进行临床检查,在发病第1周评估65项临床和实验室参数,包括14项标准和扩展血象指标和6项血液白细胞指标。采用Pearson拟合优度检验进行统计分析。通过优势比和AUC的ROC分析确定各参数的预测值。采用STATISTICA 12.0.Results建立logistic回归模型。为鉴别单纯性和混合性感染,发病时可采用以下具有“一般”或“良好”预测价值的血液学参数:带中性粒细胞计数(AUC=0.65)、白细胞与红细胞沉降率比值指数(AUC=0.66)、红细胞沉降率(AUC=0.70)、中性粒细胞粒度强度(AUC=0.66)、中性粒细胞反应性强度(AUC=0.72)、反应性淋巴细胞计数(AUC=0.72)。建立了一个具有“非常好”预测值(AUC=0.83)的logistic回归模型,该模型包括外周血中性粒细胞计数、红细胞沉降率、net - ri和net - gi四个预测因子。该模型可在发病第一周对蜱传脑炎单一感染和混合感染进行鉴别诊断,具有良好的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信